Summary
finding 15 days of cell confinement constitutionally insignificant under Sandin
Summary of this case from Pennick v. ChestermanOpinion
CV 06-41-GF-SEH.
January 8, 2007
ORDER
On November 30, 2006, United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn S. Ostby entered Findings and Recommendation in this matter. Plaintiff did not file objections. No review is required of proposed findings and recommendations to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-152 (1986). However, this Court will review Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendation for clear error.
Docket No. 9.
Upon de novo review of the record, I find no clear error in Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendation and adopt them in full.
ORDERED:
Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Docket No. 5.
The docket will reflect that Plaintiffs filing of this action counts as one strike against him for frivolousness under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Any appeal from this decision will be taken in bad faith under Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(4)(B).