From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Genelux Corp. v. Roeder

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jul 6, 2016
143 A.3d 20 (Del. 2016)

Summary

acknowledging that "vacatur is available only in a limited set of circumstances"

Summary of this case from Auto Equity Loans of Del., LLC v. Baird

Opinion

No. 631, 2015

07-06-2016

Genelux Corporation and Ronald Simus, Plaintiffs Below–Cross–Appellees, v. Albert Roeder and Byron Georgiou, Defendants Below–Cross–Appellants, and Dr. Aladar Szalay, Intervenor Below–Cross–Appellant.


Dismissed.


Summaries of

Genelux Corp. v. Roeder

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jul 6, 2016
143 A.3d 20 (Del. 2016)

acknowledging that "vacatur is available only in a limited set of circumstances"

Summary of this case from Auto Equity Loans of Del., LLC v. Baird
Case details for

Genelux Corp. v. Roeder

Case Details

Full title:Genelux Corporation and Ronald Simus, Plaintiffs Below–Cross–Appellees, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Jul 6, 2016

Citations

143 A.3d 20 (Del. 2016)

Citing Cases

Laser Tone Bus. Sys. v. Del. Micro-Computer LLC

Allowing these arguments at this stage would cause sufficient prejudice to justify precluding McGinnis from…

In re Lordstown Motors Corp.

The Delaware General Assembly intended Section 205 to provide an "adaptable, practical framework" for…