finding plaintiff's removal of a tree to be "incidental and necessary to the erection of the building"
Summary of this case from Serwatka v. Freeman Decorating Corp.June 5, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.
Present — Denman, P.J., Boomer, Lawton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Same Opinion by Denman, P.J., as in Fruin-Colnon Corp. v. Niagara Frontier Transp. Auth. ( 180 A.D.2d 222 [decided herewith]).
finding plaintiff's removal of a tree to be "incidental and necessary to the erection of the building"
Summary of this case from Serwatka v. Freeman Decorating Corp.Full title:FRUIN-COLNON CORPORATION, TRAYLOR BROS., INC., and ONYX CONSTRUCTION…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Jun 5, 1992
In evaluating whether a plaintiff was engaged in a protected activity, New York courts have interpreted…
Poulin v. E.I. DuPont DeNemours Co.Therefore, plaintiff does not have a cause of action for violation of § 241(6), or any of the rules or…