Summary
finding testamentary gift of "proceeds" of General Motors stock did not adeem specific bequest from predeath sale of stock
Summary of this case from Harris v. HinesOpinion
April 10, 1946.
May 27, 1946.
Wills — Construction — Specific bequest — Ademption.
A bequest of the "proceeds" of specific property is not adeemed by the testator's sale where the proceeds may be traced and identified.
Before MAXEY, C. J., DREW, LINN, STERN, PATTERSON, STEARNE and JONES, JJ.
Appeal, No. 71, Jan. T., 1946, from decree of O. C., Bradford Co., Sept. T., 1945, No. 39, in Estate of Helen Wyatt Frost. Decree affirmed.
Audit of partial account of executor. Before CULVER, P. J.
Adjudication filed holding that bequest of proceeds of sale of stock was not adeemed. Exceptions to adjudication dismissed and final decree entered. Exceptant appealed.
J. Roy Lilley, with him Lilley Wilson, for appellant.
John P. Vallilee, for appellee.
Argued April 10, 1946.
The question presented by this appeal is whether a bequest of "proceeds" of specific property is adeemed by a testator's sale where the proceeds may be traced and identified. The court below decided that in such circumstances the gift was not adeemed.
Testatrix provided by her will: "To my brother F. Wyatt Frost I give and bequeath any money I have in the bank. I direct my executor F. W. Frost to sell my General Motors stock as soon as may be done to advantage in his discretion, and the proceeds be equally divided between him and my sisters Annie Frost Scheide and Virginia Frost Lintern."
The death occurred July 29, 1944; the will was dated June 9, 1942; at the date of the execution of the will testatrix owned ninety shares of General Motors stock; on April 27, 1944, she sold the stock for $5,031.35; she deposited the proceeds in her checking account; a few days later she transferred all but $500 of this amount to her savings fund account (wherein were deposited other moneys) and where they remained until her death; at the time of the death there remained in the checking account $290.59, but it could not be ascertained with certainty that such cash balance constituted part of the $500 so deposited therein.
The brother claimed the entire deposit in the savings fund account under the clause of the will bequeathing to him "any money I have in the bank." The two sisters contended that since the bequest was one of "proceeds" from the sale of the stock and which had been traced and identified and found in the savings fund account, there was no ademption; that such proceeds should be divided equally among the brother and the two sisters. The learned auditing judge, in a well-considered opinion, decided that of the $5,031.35 proceeds, $4,531.35 had been traced and identified in the savings account, but that the $500 left in the checking account had not been sufficiently traced and identified. He accordingly awarded the $4,531.35 in equal thirds to the brother and the two sisters. This appeal by the brother followed.
We are in accord with the decree of distribution. This was not a specific gift of the stock itself. It was of the proceeds after sale by the executor. The testatrix, however, sold the stock in her lifetime and the proceeds were traced and identified. The learned court correctly decided this case: Black's Estate, 223 Pa. 382, 72 A. 631; Tweitmann's Estate, 293 Pa. 202, 142 A. 210.
The decree is affirmed at the cost of appellant.