In Fox v. Lindeman (143 N.Y.S. 728, 729) the court said: "There is nothing in the record to suggest that the fourth juror knowingly made a false statement" or that the circumstances in that case "in any way influenced his mind in arriving at a verdict.
Summary of this case from Dimmick v. Colonial Motor Coach CorporationNovember, 1913.
Present — Ingraham, P.J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed.
In Fox v. Lindeman (143 N.Y.S. 728, 729) the court said: "There is nothing in the record to suggest that the fourth juror knowingly made a false statement" or that the circumstances in that case "in any way influenced his mind in arriving at a verdict.
Summary of this case from Dimmick v. Colonial Motor Coach CorporationFull title:Henry Fox v. Samuel Lindeman
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1913
( Jones v. L'Ecluse, supra, p. 928.) In Fox v. Lindeman (143 N.Y.S. 728, 729) the court said: "There is…