From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleenor v. OTTAWA Cty

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Oct 26, 2021
165 Ohio St. 3d 1423 (Ohio 2021)

Summary

In Fleenor at the syllabus, the Court held "[a]n unchartered county is not sui juris and therefore must be sued in the name of its board of commissioners."

Summary of this case from Wilder v. Muskingum Cnty.

Opinion

2021-1004

10-26-2021

In re ESTATE OF FLEENOR v. OTTAWA CTY


CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

Appeal accepted on proposition of law No. II.

Kennedy, DeWine, and Stewart, JJ., would accept on all propositions of law.

O'Connor, C.J., and Donnelly and Brunner, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

Fleenor v. OTTAWA Cty

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Oct 26, 2021
165 Ohio St. 3d 1423 (Ohio 2021)

In Fleenor at the syllabus, the Court held "[a]n unchartered county is not sui juris and therefore must be sued in the name of its board of commissioners."

Summary of this case from Wilder v. Muskingum Cnty.

In Fleenor, the Ohio Supreme Court found it best to allow the trial court to address the impact of its holding and remanded the cause to the trial court for it to determine whether to allow an amendment of the complaint or dismiss the action.

Summary of this case from Wilder v. Muskingum Cnty.
Case details for

Fleenor v. OTTAWA Cty

Case Details

Full title:In re ESTATE OF FLEENOR v. OTTAWA CTY

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Oct 26, 2021

Citations

165 Ohio St. 3d 1423 (Ohio 2021)
175 N.E.3d 568

Citing Cases

Wilder v. Muskingum Cnty.

ANALYSIS {¶9} Before addressing Muskingum County's assignments of error, this Court will address the…

Bailey v. Ohio Dep't of Developmental Disabilities

Thus, counties are political subdivisions which are specifically excluded from the definition of "state"…