Summary
In Fanny v. Pike Industries, 119 N.H. 108, 398 A.2d 841 (1979), the New Hampshire Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of an action under RSA 212:34 by an off-highway recreational vehicle (OHRV) operator who was injured when he drove into a culvert where the defendant was constructing alterations to a highway interchange.
Summary of this case from Kantner v. Combustion EngineeringOpinion
No. 78-215
Decided February 28, 1979
Motor Vehicles — Negligence Actions — Contractor's Duty To Erect Barriers Contractor constructing alterations to highway interchange owed no duty to driver of off-highway recreational vehicle nor did he have a duty to erect barriers which would have prevented plaintiff from driving into a culvert and injuring himself. RSA 212:34 I, II, III, 269-C:6.
Stanley, Tardif Shapiro, of Concord (R. Peter Shapiro orally), for the plaintiff.
Wadleigh, Starr, Peters, Dunn Kohls, of Manchester (Theodore Wadleigh orally), for the defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from the granting of defendant's motion for nonsuit. Plaintiff's exception was transferred by DiClerico, J.
On June 13, 1974, the plaintiff, then fourteen, was operating a mini-bike, an off-highway recreational vehicle (OHRV), on State land. The defendant was constructing alterations to a highway interchange and the plaintiff alleged that the defendant negligently failed to warn and erect appropriate barriers which would have prevented the plaintiff from driving into a culvert and injuring himself. At trial the defendant moved for a nonsuit at the end of plaintiff's opening statement. The motion was granted after the trial court determined that there was no duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Subject to certain exceptions, RSA 212:34 I provides that a lessee or occupant of premises "owes no duty of care to keep such premises safe for . . . OHRVs as defined in RSA 269-C . . . ." Plaintiff's opening statement did not bring him within any of the exceptions. See, e.g., RSA 212:34 III. Furthermore, RSA 269-C:6 II provides that no one shall operate an OHRV "upon any portion of the right-of-way of any public way." We find no error.
Exception overruled.