From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Sutherland

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 1, 1970
451 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970)

Summary

dismissing as moot an appeal from the denial of habeas corpus because the State dismissed the underlying indictment

Summary of this case from State v. Poe

Opinion

No. 42874.

April 1, 1970.

Appeal from the County Court, Kerr County, Julius R. Neunhoffer, J.

Lavern D. Harris, Kerville, for appellant.

Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


This is an appeal from an order entered after hearing by the County Judge of Kerr County denying relief in a habeas corpus proceeding attacking the legality of appellant's confinement under commitment for fine and costs assessed by a Justice of the Peace.

Appellant's counsel has forwarded to this court an order dismissing the charges in a separate criminal action in the County Court upon motion of the County Attorney for the reason:

"The Defendant has already served sufficient time in the County Jail and is beginning to serve a two year sentence in the State Penitentiary,'

and represents to this court that because such case constituted the basis for his appeal in the habeas corpus proceeding he must now withdraw his appellate efforts in behalf of his client since it would appear that the matter is now moot.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Sutherland

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 1, 1970
451 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970)

dismissing as moot an appeal from the denial of habeas corpus because the State dismissed the underlying indictment

Summary of this case from State v. Poe
Case details for

Ex Parte Sutherland

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Stacy SUTHERLAND

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Apr 1, 1970

Citations

451 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970)

Citing Cases

State v. Poe

RENDERED MOOT Having found that appeal was timely, the court nevertheless concludes that it is moot. By…

State v. Gallardo

State v. Poe, 900 S.W.2d 442, 445 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 1995, no pet.) (dismissing appeal for want of…