In Ernst v. Holzner (130 N.Y.S. 442), where the court found tenant was not a holdover, 90% in bulk and 95%, in value, of tenant's property had been removed.
Summary of this case from Mott Pipe Supply Corp. v. Blue Ridge CoalNovember, 1911.
Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed.
In Ernst v. Holzner (130 N.Y.S. 442), where the court found tenant was not a holdover, 90% in bulk and 95%, in value, of tenant's property had been removed.
Summary of this case from Mott Pipe Supply Corp. v. Blue Ridge CoalFull title:Mortitz L. Ernst and Others v. David Holzner
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1911
No continuing lease can be predicated upon C. S., subd. 2, sec. 7322, unless it be shown, among other things,…
SCHWARTZ, INC., v. DE JONGWhere a holding-over is wrongful or voluntary, and not unavoidable, in the strictest sense, the rule must be…