From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elias v. Elias

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Summary

In Elias v. Elias (187 A.D.2d 999), the Fourth Department held that the husband, by accepting and disposing of two parcels of real estate awarded to him as part of his share of the equitable distribution of the marital estate, was "precluded from contesting on appeal the equitable distribution provisions of the judgment" (supra, at 1000; see, Harris v. Resnikoff, 118 A.D.2d 622).

Summary of this case from Roffey v. Roffey

Opinion

November 18, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.


Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of divorce as made an equitable distribution of the marital estate and obligated him to pay $300 per month as child support. Following entry of the judgment, defendant conveyed his interest in two parcels of real property awarded him by the court as a portion of his distribution of the marital estate. By accepting and disposing of the property, defendant is precluded from contesting on appeal the equitable distribution provisions of the judgment (see generally, Annotation, Spouse's Acceptance of Payments Under Alimony or Property Settlement or Child Support Provisions of Divorce Judgment as Precluding Appeal Therefrom, 29 ALR3d 1184, 1206-1209).

The parties stipulated before trial that defendant would pay child support for the one remaining unemancipated child consistent with the statutory guidelines (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [3]). In determining defendant's share of the basic child support obligation (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [f]), the court failed to determine the amount of the parties' combined parental income (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c] [1]). Because the record is insufficient to support any determination of combined parental income, we remit the matter to permit the court to receive additional evidence and to make such determination.


Summaries of

Elias v. Elias

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

In Elias v. Elias (187 A.D.2d 999), the Fourth Department held that the husband, by accepting and disposing of two parcels of real estate awarded to him as part of his share of the equitable distribution of the marital estate, was "precluded from contesting on appeal the equitable distribution provisions of the judgment" (supra, at 1000; see, Harris v. Resnikoff, 118 A.D.2d 622).

Summary of this case from Roffey v. Roffey
Case details for

Elias v. Elias

Case Details

Full title:JOANNE ELIAS, Respondent, v. FRANK E. ELIAS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Roffey v. Roffey

Plaintiff asserts that by trading in his boat and merging the corporations, defendant "received the benefits"…

Novitski v. Novitski

Second, the wife has waived her claim to vacate the judgment under CPLR 5015 (a) (3) because she accepted the…