From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Egger v. Marriott Int'l, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 8, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-6274 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 2011)

Summary

finding that a fraudulent joinder argument was "untimely" and had been "waived" when it was first raised in a brief opposing remand that was filed fifty-five days after service of the complaint

Summary of this case from Choupak v. Rivkin

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-6274

12-08-2011

DIANNE CATES EGGER, ET AL. v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (ECF No. 4), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and that this case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

R. BARCLAY SURRICK , J.


Summaries of

Egger v. Marriott Int'l, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 8, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-6274 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 2011)

finding that a fraudulent joinder argument was "untimely" and had been "waived" when it was first raised in a brief opposing remand that was filed fifty-five days after service of the complaint

Summary of this case from Choupak v. Rivkin
Case details for

Egger v. Marriott Int'l, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DIANNE CATES EGGER, ET AL. v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 8, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-6274 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 2011)

Citing Cases

Webgistix Corp. v. Erie Ins. Co.

See Phillips v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc., 591 F.Supp.2d 822, 825-26 (E.D.Va. 2008) ("The petition for…

Coralluzzo v. Darden Rests., Inc.

Plaintiff does not challenge Defendants' representations that Darden and Rare Management are not citizens of…