From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 27, 1999
743 So. 2d 76 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

pointing out that the habitual felony offender statute only requires that the last prior felony conviction, or release from prison, "be within five years of the date of the current offense"

Summary of this case from Pugh v. Sec'y, DOC

Opinion

No. 99-1897.

Opinion filed August 27, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, Hale R. Stancil, Judge.

Alfonzo Edwards, Bushnell, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Defendant, Alfonzo Edwards, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion. Defendant claims that he was improperly sentenced as an habitual felony offender because the trial court relied on a prior conviction for possession of a controlled substance which defendant contends cannot be used as a predicate offense for habitualization.

Section 775.084(1)(a)3, Florida Statutes, requires that "[t]he felony for which the defendant is to be sentenced and one of the two prior felony convictions, is not a violation of section 893.13 relating to the purchase or the possession of a controlled substance." Section 775.084(1)(a)2 provides that the felony for which the defendant is being sentenced must be committed within five years of defendant's last prior felony or defendant's release from a prison sentence for a felony. Defendant received an habitual offender sentence for sale of cocaine within 1000 feet of a school. Although one of his prior convictions was a violation of section 893.13, the sentencing transcript attached to the trial court's order confirms that defendant's other prior convictions were for aggravated assault, attempted kidnapping, false imprisonment, battery, resisting arrest without violence and accessory to armed robbery.

Defendant complains that his new offense was not committed within five years of release from prison for a qualified predicate offense, arguing that the possession offense does not qualify for use as a predicate. Nothing in the statute, however, prohibits sentencing a defendant as a habitual felony offender when the current offense was committed within five years of release from prison for a conviction for purchase or possession of a controlled substance in violation of 893.13. As we pointed out in Clark v. State, 681 So.2d 816 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), the habitual felony offender statute only requires that defendant's last prior felony conviction, or release from prison, be within five years of the date of the current offense.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 27, 1999
743 So. 2d 76 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

pointing out that the habitual felony offender statute only requires that the last prior felony conviction, or release from prison, "be within five years of the date of the current offense"

Summary of this case from Pugh v. Sec'y, DOC
Case details for

Edwards v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALFONZO EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 27, 1999

Citations

743 So. 2d 76 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Affirmed. See Greenlee v. State, 591 So.2d 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Lynch v. State, 881 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA…

Williams v. State

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(a)(2) ; State v. Richardson, 915 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2005) ; Williams v.…