Summary
finding that the defendants satisfied their burden in establishing that the plaintiffs had no reasonable possibility of recovery against a defendant when there was evidence that the defendant's vehicle did not contact the plaintiff's vehicle
Summary of this case from Dorsey v. Hertz Corp.Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-19-SDD-SCR
05-15-2015
HILDA EDWARDS, ET AL. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.
RULING
The Court, after carefully considering the Petition , the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated April 17, 2015, to which no objection has been filed, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.
Rec. Doc. 1-1.
Rec. Doc. 21.
ACCORDINGLY, the Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiffs, Hilda and Arthur Edwards, is denied.
Rec. Doc. 8.
--------
Baton Rouge, Louisiana the 15 day of May, 2015.
/s/_________
SHELLY D. DICK, DISTRICT JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA