From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durall v. Simon

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Oct 5, 2000
102 Wn. App. 1050 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

holding that because plaintiff received net judgment, trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding plaintiff was substantially prevailing party and thus entitled to fees

Summary of this case from Fletcher Hill, Inc. v. Crosbie

Opinion

No. 18760-8-III.

October 5, 2000. UNREPORTED OPINION

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 98-2-00542-3, C. James Lust, J., entered August 25, 1999.


Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Kurtz, C.J., and Brown, J.


Summaries of

Durall v. Simon

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Oct 5, 2000
102 Wn. App. 1050 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)

holding that because plaintiff received net judgment, trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding plaintiff was substantially prevailing party and thus entitled to fees

Summary of this case from Fletcher Hill, Inc. v. Crosbie
Case details for

Durall v. Simon

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. DURALL, Respondent , v. STEVE L. SIMON, ET AL., Appellants

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three

Date published: Oct 5, 2000

Citations

102 Wn. App. 1050 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)
102 Wash. App. 1050

Citing Cases

Fletcher Hill, Inc. v. Crosbie

To support its position, Fletcher Hill relies on an unpublished Washington Court of Appeals opinion, which…