From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Sentry Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 8, 1983
434 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Summary

denying petition for writ of certiorari due to petitioner's failure to supply an appendix

Summary of this case from Cook v. City of Winter Haven P.D

Opinion

No. 83-986.

July 8, 1983.

L. Hunter Limbaugh, of Haas, Boehm, Brown, Rigdon Seacrest, P.A., Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

Charles D. Hood, Jr., of Cobb Cole, P.A., Daytona Beach, for respondent.


ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI


This case is before us on a petition for writ of certiorari and an accompanying petition for emergency stay writ. It is necessary for petitioner to provide this court with an appendix and because he failed to do so the petitions are denied. Rule 9.100(e), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure; Aleshire v. Ackerman, 418 So.2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Writ denied.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dunn v. Sentry Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 8, 1983
434 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

denying petition for writ of certiorari due to petitioner's failure to supply an appendix

Summary of this case from Cook v. City of Winter Haven P.D
Case details for

Dunn v. Sentry Insurance

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE D. DUNN, PETITIONER, v. SENTRY INSURANCE, ETC., RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 8, 1983

Citations

434 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Cook v. City of Winter Haven P.D

This is not a case where a petition has been properly dismissed based on a party's complete failure to supply…