From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunay v. Ladenburg, Thalmann Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 18, 1984
106 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Summary

reversing grant of protective order concerning documents created after the dissolution date in a case involving a breach of fiduciary duty claim

Summary of this case from Maxon v. Mirror Show Mgt., Inc.

Opinion

December 18, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew R. Tyler, J.).


Plaintiff and defendants Ronald B. Koenig (Koenig) and Stephen S. Weisglass (Weisglass) in 1974 entered into a joint venture, named LTRA, which engaged in the stock brokerage business. LTRA was dissolved in April, 1979. Shortly thereafter plaintiff commenced the instant action. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges, inter alia, that the defendants, including Koenig and Weisglass, breached their fiduciary duty to him, by causing the dissolution of LTRA and appropriating for their own benefit LTRA's business, business relationships and business opportunities. Now, plaintiff seeks by a notice to produce (CPLR 3120), inter alia, documents created by the defendants after 1979. Defendants moved for a protective order. Special Term granted it, as to those post-1979 documents.

We disagree. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the documents in issue are relevant and material since a breach of a fiduciary duty is a continuing one and survives the dissolution of a joint venture ( Jones Co. v. Burke, 306 N.Y. 172, 192). Further, if plaintiff is successful, he would be entitled to a share of the proceeds of the successor venture.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Carro, Fein and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Dunay v. Ladenburg, Thalmann Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 18, 1984
106 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

reversing grant of protective order concerning documents created after the dissolution date in a case involving a breach of fiduciary duty claim

Summary of this case from Maxon v. Mirror Show Mgt., Inc.
Case details for

Dunay v. Ladenburg, Thalmann Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD DUNAY, Respondent-Appellant, v. LADENBURG, THALMANN Co., INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Maxon v. Mirror Show Mgt., Inc.

The request for discovery of events and documents after the appropriate valuation date may also be relevant…

Briarpatch Limited, L.P. v. Thomas

It is further alleged that Geisler is required to remain a constructive trustee and fiduciary to Briarpatch…