holding that petitioner must show that he was prejudiced by her counsel's failure to file a motion to sever
Summary of this case from United States v. Dogan93-3054.
October 18, 1993.
E.D.La., 795 F.Supp. 184.
AFFIRMED
holding that petitioner must show that he was prejudiced by her counsel's failure to file a motion to sever
Summary of this case from United States v. DoganIn McGinnis v. Star Enter., No. 93-1234, 8 F.3d 20 (December 21, 1993) (unpublished), a franchisee brought suit against a franchisor alleging that the franchisor had constructively terminated a franchise in violation of the PMPA along with causes of action for breach of contract, violation of the Texas Deceptive Practices Act, and antitrust violations.
Summary of this case from April Marketing & Distributing Corp. v. Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co.In McGinnis v. Star Enter., 8 F.3d 20 (1993) (unpublished), a franchisee brought suit against a franchisor alleging that the franchisor had constructively terminated a franchise in violation of the PMPA along with causes of action for breach of contract, violation of the Texas Deceptive Practices Act, and antitrust violations.
Summary of this case from Meghani v. Shell Oil Co.Full title:Dugger v. Upledger Institute
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Date published: Oct 18, 1993
The April Marketing court's skepticism of the constructive termination claim was evidenced, first, by that…
U.S. v. KnowlesWe have reversed other convictions against defendants who had pleaded guilty to charges brought under the Gun…