From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duffy v. Muller

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Nov 1, 1906
52 Misc. 11 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1906)

Summary

In Duffy v. Muller, 52 Misc. Rep. 11, in a somewhat similar case, the court said: "The referee is entitled to a sale fee on the amount bid and to commissions on the amount in his hands for distribution."

Summary of this case from Buchan v. Buchan

Opinion

November, 1906.

William J.A. McKim, for Adam Wiener, referee.

Roswell S. Nichols, for defendants.


The referee is entitled to a sale fee on the amount bid and to commissions on the amount in his hands for distribution. Section 3297 of the Code provides: "The fees of a referee appointed to sell real property pursuant to a judgment in an action, are the same as those allowed to the sheriff, and he is allowed the same disbursements as the sheriff." The provisions of subdivision 7 of section 3307 limit the fee basis in the case of a sheriff to the amount collected, in other words, the amount for which he is accountable. The premises in this action were sold by the referee at $18,100, free and clear; upon that sum the respective shares of the parties were measured, and within the meaning of section 3307 that is the amount collected and for which the referee is accountable. Upon that amount, therefore, should his sale fee be computed. This construction of section 3307 is emphasized by the provisions of section 3297, which create a distinction between the sale fee and the commissions on distribution, limiting only the latter to the amount actually distributed. The referee should be allowed $30 for applying the respective shares of the three parties to whom the bid was assigned.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Duffy v. Muller

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Nov 1, 1906
52 Misc. 11 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1906)

In Duffy v. Muller, 52 Misc. Rep. 11, in a somewhat similar case, the court said: "The referee is entitled to a sale fee on the amount bid and to commissions on the amount in his hands for distribution."

Summary of this case from Buchan v. Buchan
Case details for

Duffy v. Muller

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE M. DUFFY, Plaintiff, v . ALOIS C. MULLER et al., Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, New York Special Term

Date published: Nov 1, 1906

Citations

52 Misc. 11 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1906)
102 N.Y.S. 296

Citing Cases

Schorner v. Schorner

( Knickerbocker v Candee, 172 App. Div. 931.) Thus, although the fees of a referee in partition are to be…

Buchan v. Buchan

The interlocutory judgment did not find that the plaintiff had a lien on the real estate, but only on the…