In Duclos v. Cunningham, 102 N.Y. 678, 6 N.E. 790, the owner disavowed the listing and then defended on the ground the broker had not disclosed the names of the purchasers.
Summary of this case from Orange City Hills, Inc. v. Florida Realty Bureau, Inc.Argued April 15, 1886
Decided April 30, 1886
Charles Edward Souther for appellant.
James M. Smith for respondent.
Per Curiam mem. for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Duclos v. Cunningham, 102 N.Y. 678, 6 N.E. 790, the owner disavowed the listing and then defended on the ground the broker had not disclosed the names of the purchasers.
Summary of this case from Orange City Hills, Inc. v. Florida Realty Bureau, Inc.Full title:POLYDORE DUCLOS, Respondent, v . WILLIAM T. CUNNINGHAM et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 30, 1886
In other words, he cannot avail himself of the services, and, by making a sale through information derived…
Habib v. Caputo( Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co., 144 N.Y. 209; Pelletreau v. Brennan, 113 A.D. 806.) It has been…