From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dreyer v. Shapiro

Supreme Court, Kings County
Mar 18, 1927
143 Misc. 170 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1927)

Summary

In Dreyer v. Shapiro (143 Misc. 170), Mr. Justice CROPSEY held that a plaintiff who recovered less than $2,000 at a time when the statutory minimum was $2,000 was not entitled to costs although at the time the action was instituted the statutory minimum was $500.

Summary of this case from Davis v. Pechter

Opinion

March 18, 1927.

Eisenberg Eisenberg, for the plaintiff.

Nadal, Jones Mowton [Kenneth v. Fisher of counsel], for the defendant Sarah Gelberg.

Benjamin C. Loder, for the defendant Rose Shapiro.


Motion granted. When the action was started the statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1474) provided in effect that costs could be recovered if plaintiff obtained an award of $500 or more. Before the trial the statute was amended to provide in effect that no costs would be recoverable unless the award was $2,000 or more.

The amendment did not except pending actions. It, therefore, applies to all actions and speaks as of the time when judgment may be entered. That is the rule in this State. (15 C.J. 23, 24; Supervisors of Onondaga v. Briggs, 3 Den. 173; Munson v. Curtis, 43 Hun, 214, 216; Erie County v. Fridenberg, 161 N.Y.S. 401.)

As plaintiff recovered less than $2,000, he is not entitled to costs.


Summaries of

Dreyer v. Shapiro

Supreme Court, Kings County
Mar 18, 1927
143 Misc. 170 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1927)

In Dreyer v. Shapiro (143 Misc. 170), Mr. Justice CROPSEY held that a plaintiff who recovered less than $2,000 at a time when the statutory minimum was $2,000 was not entitled to costs although at the time the action was instituted the statutory minimum was $500.

Summary of this case from Davis v. Pechter

In Dreyer v. Shapiro (143 Misc. 170), Mr. Justice CROPSEY held that a plaintiff who recovered less than $2,000 at a time when the statutory minimum was $2,000 was not entitled to costs although at the time the action was instituted the statutory minimum was $500.

Summary of this case from Davis v. Pechter
Case details for

Dreyer v. Shapiro

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DREYER, Plaintiff, v. ROSE SHAPIRO and SARAH GELBERG, Improperly…

Court:Supreme Court, Kings County

Date published: Mar 18, 1927

Citations

143 Misc. 170 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1927)
255 N.Y.S. 602

Citing Cases

Reisner v. 749 Broadway Realty Corp.

Jerome I. Hyman and Julius B. Sucher for appellants. Abraham Burstein for respondent. HAMMER, HOFSTADTER and…

Reisner v. 749 Broadway Realty Corp.

Per Curiam. The right to costs is governed by the statute in effect when the right to costs accrues, not that…