Summary
In Pidot v. Zenith Radio Corporation, 308 Ill. App. 323, 31 N.E.2d 385, 393 (1941), the court said: "It is apparent that insofar as the parties were concerned, plaintiffs' design was new and novel."
Summary of this case from Kamin v. KuhnauOpinion
Gen. No. 41,288. (Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion filed January 22, 1941
INSURANCE, § 322 — reinstatement, effect. Where insurance policy was reinstated after lapse for nonpayment of premiums, insured was in the same position as though there had been no lapse, a one-year incontestable clause was applicable, and where upon reinstatement insured furnished all evidence of good health that was required, insured could not avoid liability on ground that representation of good health was false.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. THOMAS A. GREEN, presiding.
Affirmed. Heard in third division, first district, this court at June term, 1940.
Meyer A. Ginsburg, for appellant;
McKinley, Price Quindry, for appellee;
William McKinley and Paul E. Price, of counsel.
"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed January 22, 1941.