affirming the district court's grant of a motion to proceed anonymously “[after a careful review of all the circumstances of th[e] case.”

reversing grant of defendant's motion for summary judgment where testimony created "genuine issues of material fact" of whether the defendant's "asserted reasons for discharging her [were] pretext"

observing that "stray remarks by decision-makers, which were unrelated to the decision-making process ... could provide background evidence that may be critical to a jury's determination of whether the decision-maker was more likely than not acting out of a discriminatory motive"

observing that "stray remarks by decision-makers, which were unrelated to the decision-making process . . . could provide background evidence that may be critical to a jury's determination of whether the decision-maker was more likely than not acting out of a discriminatory motive"

noting that, for purposes of demonstrating the fourth element of a prima facie employment discrimination case, “[t]he evidence most often used to establish this nexus [between the plaintiff's protected status and the adverse employment action] is that of disparate treatment, whereby a plaintiff shows that she was treated less favorably than similarly situated employees who are not in plaintiff's protected class”