From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dispositons of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 1, 1999
560 Pa. 742 (Pa. 1999)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that defendant's assertion that her sentence of ninety days' incarceration for driving while under suspension was excessive did not raise a substantial question so as to permit appellate review of the discretionary aspects of the sentence, where sentence was within statutory limits

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Coolbaugh
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

November 1999.

Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation ___________________ _______ ________ ___________ ____________

Com. v. Klein ............ 11/4/1999 507 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 742 A.2d 206 (1999) Com. v. Kleitman ......... 11/3/1999 745 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 742 A.2d 206 (1999) Com. v. Kraft ............ 11/24/1999 0814 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 737 A.2d 755 (1999) Com. v. Kunco ............ 11/16/1999 442 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 739 A.2d 589 (1999) Com. v. Lane ............. 11/24/1999 501 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 742 A.2d 206 (1999) Com. v. Le ............... 11/10/1999 0851 Denied Pa. Super., M.D. 718 A.2d 344 (1999) Com. v. Lighty ........... 11/23/1999 522 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 742 A.2d 1147 (1999) Com. v. Lucas ............ 11/9/1999 464 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 739 A.2d 589 (1999) Com. v. Luke ............. 11/10/1999 277 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 737 A.2d 808 (1999) Com. v. Maguire .......... 11/9/1999 550 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 739 A.2d 589 (1999) Com. v. Maldonado ........ 11/5/1999 470 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 742 A.2d 207 (1999) Com. v. McGary ........... 11/16/1999 488 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 742 A.2d 207 (1999) Com. v. Melendez ......... 11/4/1999 721 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 742 A.2d 207 (1999) Com. v. Melendez ......... 11/9/1999 379 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 737 A.2d 1276 (1999) Com. v. Merkow ........... 11/9/1999 093 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 736 A.2d 683 (1999)

Summaries of

Dispositons of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 1, 1999
560 Pa. 742 (Pa. 1999)

holding that defendant's assertion that her sentence of ninety days' incarceration for driving while under suspension was excessive did not raise a substantial question so as to permit appellate review of the discretionary aspects of the sentence, where sentence was within statutory limits

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Coolbaugh

determining appellant's claim that sentence of incarceration for DUS violation was excessive because sentencing court failed to adequately consider certain mitigating factors did not raise substantial question

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Patterson

determining appellant's claim that sentence of incarceration for DUS violation was excessive because sentencing court failed to adequately consider certain mitigating factors did not raise substantial question

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Disalvo
Case details for

Dispositons of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 1, 1999

Citations

560 Pa. 742 (Pa. 1999)
747 A.2d 363

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Velazquez

Quoting Commonwealth v. Disalvo, 70 A.3d 900 (Pa. Super. 2013), in Commonwealth v. Patterson, 180 A.3d 1217…

Commonwealth v. Patterson

"this [c]ourt has held on numerous occasions that a claim of inadequate consideration of mitigating factors…

7 Citing Cases