Summary
holding that a judicial decision was not invalidated by the later determination of the Commission that the trial judge had violated the Code of Judicial Conduct
Summary of this case from Keenan v. AllanOpinion
1991
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Dispositions of Petitions for REVIEW[fn†
The Supreme Court of Washington
Jan 1, 1991
116 Wn. 2d 1030 (Wash. 1991)
Summaries of
Dispositions of Petitions for REVIEW[fn†
The Supreme Court of Washington
Jan 1, 1991
116 Wn. 2d 1030 (Wash. 1991)
holding that a judicial decision was not invalidated by the later determination of the Commission that the trial judge had violated the Code of Judicial Conduct
Summary of this case from Keenan v. AllanCase details for
Dispositions of Petitions for REVIEW[fn†
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW[fn†
Court:The Supreme Court of Washington
Date published: Jan 1, 1991
Citations
116 Wn. 2d 1030 (Wash. 1991)
116 Wash. 2d 1030
Citing Cases
State v. Walden
Thus, a self-defense instruction is not always required if the defendant suffered from the delusion that he…
State v. SivoThus, the State may decide to amend that charge on retrial, making this instruction relevant. State v. Bell,…