looking to other jurisdictions for guidance and adopting a holding that "is consistent with the majority of other jurisdictions that have addressed this issue."
Summary of this case from RCDI Construction, Inc. v. Spaceplan/Architecture, Planning & Interiors, P.A.2000
looking to other jurisdictions for guidance and adopting a holding that "is consistent with the majority of other jurisdictions that have addressed this issue."
Summary of this case from RCDI Construction, Inc. v. Spaceplan/Architecture, Planning & Interiors, P.A.Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 2000
In light of the 1994 occurrence date of the accident at issue and the initiation of litigation in 1997, we…
Summitt v. SummittThe North Carolina court's orders under URESA did not automatically nullify or vacate the Kansas orders.…