Summary
stating that " trial court is allowed to take judicial notice of the reliability of the LTI 20-20 laser based upon a trial court's prior case pursuant to Evid.R. 201(B)"
Summary of this case from State v. SaphireOpinion
1998.
stating that " trial court is allowed to take judicial notice of the reliability of the LTI 20-20 laser based upon a trial court's prior case pursuant to Evid.R. 201(B)"
Summary of this case from State v. Saphire1998.
stating that " trial court is allowed to take judicial notice of the reliability of the LTI 20-20 laser based upon a trial court's prior case pursuant to Evid.R. 201(B)"
Summary of this case from State v. SaphireFull title:DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
See State v. Beuke (1998), 130 Ohio App.3d 633, 636, 720 N.E.2d 962, jurisdictional motion overruled (1999),…
State v. SmithMotion No. 52164. For example, we have held that the filing of a pro se, supplemental brief before this court…