Summary
affirming the district court's determination that meal planning was an abstract idea
Summary of this case from Tech Pharmacy Servs., LLC v. Alixa RX LLCOpinion
2014-1631
04-08-2015
ERIC WILLIAM BUETHER, Buether Joe & Carpenter LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. J. CHRISTOPHER CARRAWAY, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by NORMAN ANDREW SFEIR. VERA RANIERI, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA, for amici curiae Application Developers Alliance, et al. Also represented by DANIEL K. NAZER; CHARLES DUAN, Public Knowledge, Washington, DC.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:13-cv-08391-PAE, Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.
JUDGMENT
ERIC WILLIAM BUETHER, Buether Joe & Carpenter LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. J. CHRISTOPHER CARRAWAY, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by NORMAN ANDREW SFEIR. VERA RANIERI, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA, for amici curiae Application Developers Alliance, et al. Also represented by DANIEL K. NAZER; CHARLES DUAN, Public Knowledge, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 8, 2015
Date
/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole
Daniel E. O'Toole
Clerk of Court