Summary
In Dexter v. Ivins, 133 N.Y. 551, referring to an alleged change from an action for salary to an action for damages for wrongful discharge, the court refused to reverse the judgment on the ground that no such change as was charged and relied upon by the appellants had in fact been made, but distinctly intimated that if such had been the case it would have been error.
Summary of this case from Balch v. WurzburgerOpinion
Argued March 24, 1892
Decided April 12, 1892
James G. Burnett for appellants.
James Thomas H. Troy for respondent.
O'BRIEN, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except GRAY, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.