noting that Court of Chancery found, inter alia, that denial of motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction did not determine a substantial issue under Rule 42
Summary of this case from And v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (In re Ltd.)No. 650, 2009.
November 25, 2009.
Appeal from the Chancery CA 4494.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Appeal Refused.
noting that Court of Chancery found, inter alia, that denial of motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction did not determine a substantial issue under Rule 42
Summary of this case from And v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (In re Ltd.)noting that Court of Chancery found, inter alia, that denial of motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction did not determine a substantial issue under Rule 42
Summary of this case from Hudson v. Int'l Paper, Co. (In re Ltd.)Full title:Curran Composites, Inc. v. Total Holdings USA, Inc
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Nov 25, 2009
Def.'s Letter in Support of Appl. for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal at 1 (D.I. 286). TowerHill Wealth…
Food & Water Watch v. Del. Dep't of Nat. Res. & Envtl. ControlSprint Nextel Corp, 2008 WL 2861717, at *1. Curran Composites, Inc. v. Total Holdings USA, Inc., 2009 WL…