From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crenshaw v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Mar 5, 2002
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:01-CV-405-Y (N.D. Tex. Mar. 5, 2002)

Summary

adopting a recommendation that rejects the same theory

Summary of this case from Mitchell v. Dretke

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:01-CV-405-Y

March 5, 2002


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS (With Special Instructions to Clerk of the Court)


The Court has made an independent review of the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on January 18, 2002.
3. The Petitioner's written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on February 28, 2002.

The Court, after de novo review, finds and determines that Petitioner's objections must be overruled, that the Respondent's motion to dismiss as time barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) should be denied, and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus should be denied, for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge should be, and are hereby, ADOPTED.

It is therefore ORDERED that Respondent's September 20, 2001 motion to dismiss, in part, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) be, and is hereby, DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be, and is hereby, DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that the clerk of the Court shall transmit a copy of this order to Petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested.


Summaries of

Crenshaw v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Mar 5, 2002
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:01-CV-405-Y (N.D. Tex. Mar. 5, 2002)

adopting a recommendation that rejects the same theory

Summary of this case from Mitchell v. Dretke
Case details for

Crenshaw v. Cockrell

Case Details

Full title:Damon Crenshaw, Petitioner, v. Janie Cockrell, Director, Texas Department…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: Mar 5, 2002

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:01-CV-405-Y (N.D. Tex. Mar. 5, 2002)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Dretke

As Dretke recognizes, the Courts in this Division have rejected his theory. E.g., Daugherty v. Dretke, No.…

Wilkinson v. Cockrell

Thus, limitations did not begin until the date on which the state trial court's judgment adjudicating…