Summary
declining to dismiss appeal based on concise statement where it was not clear that the appellant used the concise statement to intentionally subvert the intent of Rule 1925(b)
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. GeigerOpinion
No. 3130 EDA 2018
07-17-2020
Alisa CREIGHTON and Jippey Creighton, h/w, Appellants v. KIDDIE ACADEMY OF PLUMSTEADVILLE ; BJ Kids, Inc. ; Janice E. Visconto; the Estate of William Visconto; Kiddie Academy; Kiddie Academy Child Learning Center; Kiddie Academy Domestic Franchising, LLC ; Tom Keenan Builders ; Tom Keenan ; Pinnacle Pavement, LLC; Hanover Commons Associates, L.P.; D&B Cares for Kids, Inc.; Shan-Gri-La Sod Farm ; Keenan Builders; and Estate of Don Keenan, Appellees v. SGL Contractors, Inc., Appellee
Non-Precedential Decision
See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing
Affirmed. Vacated. Vacated. Remanded. Jurisdiction relinquished.