providing that the under-color-of-state-law element of § 1983 does not contemplate "merely private conduct"
Summary of this case from Studley v. WatfordNo. 08–1423.
12-13-2010
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. OMEGA, S. A.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
providing that the under-color-of-state-law element of § 1983 does not contemplate "merely private conduct"
Summary of this case from Studley v. WatfordFull title:COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. OMEGA, S. A
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 13, 2010
In addition, the Ninth Circuit recently held that § 109(a) does not apply to foreign-manufactured goods…
Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp.The Supreme Court granted certiorari, and an equally divided Court summarily affirmed. Costco Wholesale Corp.…