316 F.R.D. 277 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corley v. Google, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Aug 19, 2016

316 F.R.D. 277 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

Summary

In Corley, Judge Koh held that more than 800 plaintiffs who alleged that Google unlawfully intercepted their emails failed to satisfy the "same transaction" requirement of Rule 20.

Summary of this case from Renati v. Wal-Mart Stores

See 4 Summaries

Opinion

For Ryan Corley, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For William Dormann, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Shannon Mehaffey, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andy Ambrose, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brandon Arachikavitz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Adam Alsabery, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Moshe Admon, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Vienna Alvarez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Callum Aldred, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sean Antonacci, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Luke Anderson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Javier Aguirre, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Bryce Allen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Liban Aden, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nadia Aissi, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Benjamin Algeo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For John Alexander, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kenneth Abeyratne, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Caroline Alrman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Charlee Akina, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lucas Acosta, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aisana Aitzhanova, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For William Alverson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Scott Arellano, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Omeed Atefi, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Talia Avisar, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Martha Avtandilian, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Noah Baily, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jared Baker, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matt Baker, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Balsam, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jason Balsamo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Laura Barajas, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kenia Barba, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mark Barbosa, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cory Barclay, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christopher Barnard, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Halley Barnett, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Baroody, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Forrest Bashaw, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Laura Bates, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Melissa Bates, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mridul Batra, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lorna Battista, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For John Becker, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Evan Beckner, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brett Bell, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ayla Benavides, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Edward Benitez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Frank Benitez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Megan Bergeron, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Patrick Bergerson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rim Berhane, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Robert Berry, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rhiannon Bezore, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matei Bivolaru, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For James Boggie, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Eleanor Bohn, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Myken Bomberger, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jesse Bonelli, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mariel Booth, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michaella Borges, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Max Brawer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Patricio Brito, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Brog, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Grant Bronsdon, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Laura Bronson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jake Broser, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Peter Broski, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Barbara Brown, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cameron Brown, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Noranda Brown, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mark Brunton, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jonica Buck, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For John Buell, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Wrenn Bunker-Koesters, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ryan Burke, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Adam Buxbaum, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Janel Calinog, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Francesca Campos, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Katherine Cannon, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Veronica Cano Chavez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lauren Carlton, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christian Carrillo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lauren Cason, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rachel Castiglione, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Britanny Castillo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Karen Catlow, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Samuel Cavazos, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexander Cerjan, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Meagan Chamberlain, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brett Chamberlin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kevin Chaney, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brian Chang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Thomas Chavez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jonathan Chen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Randy Cherland, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ritish Chhabra, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Chiang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nina Chidichimo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cody Childers, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sandra Childress, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For James Chiocchio, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Choi, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ref Chowdhury, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Allen Chung, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Chelsea Clark, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jordan Colclasure, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lisette Cole, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew Collins, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Stephen Colon, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew Colucci, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ethan Compton, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Emily Connelly, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Julianne Conrad, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Logan Cooper, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tiffany Cooper, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Heather Copps, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Harrison Corbett, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jeremy Cordeiro, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicholas Corpuz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Eudald Correig Fraga, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Erica Cortez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Renata Costa, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joshua Cottrell-Schloemer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Layton Cox, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Marlee Craker, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dax Crocker, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rory Crook, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Pierre Cuglievan, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Stephen D'Addio, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mark Dalgaard, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Bret Dalldorf, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Danehower, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Zachari Daquioag, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Deborah Davis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Eli Davis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Katrina Davis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Hillary Dawsey, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph De Jonge, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Paul De La Torre, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brenda De Leon, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Juliet Deamicis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tyler Deangelis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Deck, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Anthony Del Cid, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Danielle Delbert, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Maxwell Denny, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Diaz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lillian DiCarlo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jeremy Diehl, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Amber Diluzio, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brian Dinh, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Vincent Dirienzo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Blake Disiere, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexander Dobranic, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Edward Dobyns, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aaron Doucett, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Phillip Dove, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Octav Dragoi, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sean Draper, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Chris Driscoll, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aliah Drow, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Krista Drummond, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kenneth Duckworth, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Dulle, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Julia Dunn, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Samuel Dunscombe, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For John Durbin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Easterby, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew Ecord, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Bianca Edwards, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Elkus, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Zina Ellis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aunna Elrod, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Colton Emel, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Justin Emery, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Chase Engelhardt, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jonathan Englehart, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ian Epps, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michelle Erford, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mariah Erlick, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Julie Etheridge, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rachel Ett, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Carl Evans, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For James Everglade, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Bryan Eyers, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Holden Faber, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kelsey Fahey, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Roger Fairley, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sean Fanning, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Robert Farrar, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kelsey Farrell, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Anton Fedorov, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Julia Feldman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For James Feng, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kristy Fenning, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Fernandez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tova Ferstenberg, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jose Figueroa Delgado, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Zachary Finch, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Fisherkeller, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Flagg, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brandon Flannery, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cynthia Flores, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kimberly Flores, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Skylar Florian, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ryan Flynn, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Corinne Foley, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For John Forbes, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexandria Foster, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Shannon Fouts, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Frailey, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Samuel Frank, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joel Frattini, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mark Fredrickson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mark Freeman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Freifeld, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Charles Fukai, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Thaine Fuller, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Megan Gaebler, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brian Gamez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mary Garcia, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Abigail Gardner, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kenneth Garges, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Gauthier, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicole Gedert, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Benjamin Geilich, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Paula Gelvez-Petrone, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Geyer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rajan Gill, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For James Gillooley, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jessica Giusti, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jessica Golden, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alex Goldklang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matt Goldman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joel Goldschlag, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Leonardo Gonzalez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Goodknight, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Gradias, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Shari Gray, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew Grazioli, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Greenbaum, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rachel Greenbaum, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Robert Griego III, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Peter Griffis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Catherine Grizzell, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Derek Grosshart, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Guillory, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Seth Guldin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Bishal Gupta, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Samir Gupta, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Peter Gustafson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Carmen Gutierrez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jerrelle Guy, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jerome Hale, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Hall, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicholas Hall, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Hallock, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mark Hamilton, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Marina Handwerk, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christine Hanna, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Courtney Hanson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sawyer Hardie, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Quinn Hatoff, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Eric Haviland, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Miles Hearn, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lauren Hebert, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Taylor Heisley-Cook, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Richard Heitmeyer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Devon Henry, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nelson Hernandez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Austin Herry, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Noah Hersom, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jesse Hertz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Elin Hervall, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mitchell Heschke, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Gordon Hiland, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cory Hill, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brandon Hodges, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Hailey Hollers, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mark Hollwedel, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Demarie Holmes, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nia Holston, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tyler Howell, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ellen Howes, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kai Hoyt, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicholas Hoyt, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sally Hu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kensai Hughes, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kayla Hutchings, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Torri Igou, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Timothy Irvine, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jillian Jackson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Chris Jacobson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Murtaza Jafferji, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Yesenia Jameson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Gustavo Jauregui, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Maria Jennings, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jasmeet Jernaill, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Thomas Jobst, Jr., Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nina Johal, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Johns, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Karl Johnson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rosa Johnson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ryan Johnson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aaron Jones, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Crystal Joseph, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Evan Kahn, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Kaspark, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brandon Kassimir, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Archavanich Kawmongkolsi, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Kayaleh, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jesse Kelly, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aaron Kenny, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Siri Kirin Khalsa, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aaron Khansefid, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For B. Kim, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dae Han Kim, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Shawn Kim, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew King, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ryan King, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Royce Kirk, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Carli Kitto, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jessica Klix, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Janice Knight, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Justin Kohlberg, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Casey Kono, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alec Konstantin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Maksim Korolev, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tarun Koshy, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kyle Kovacs, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ryan Kreisberg, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexandra Kurtz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brian Kurtz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rhonda La Grande, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rosemary La Grua, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Antonio Lamv, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Justas Lauzadis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nathan Lawson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Evan Layman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cassandra Leasure, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Lecours, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Bryan Leddy, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jennifer Lee-Yuen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joanne Lee-Yuen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Josh Lehga, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Adam Leotta, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Benjamin Lesea-Pringle, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Martha Letchinger, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Shannon Levis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Lewis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Lewis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Erica Leyva Arenas, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Helen Li, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Li, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Chelsea Liebowitz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Anthony Lim, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Danielle Littman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Liu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joshua Liu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Athena Lo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sergey Lobatch, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Lopez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Love, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Signe Loving, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Janet Lu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Eric Lujan, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Elias Luna, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Xinjie Luo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Lusher, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Devin Lynch, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sean Lyness, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Casimir Lyszczarczyk, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Benjamin Mabie, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Steven Mach, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Carleigh Madden, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Colin Madrid, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For William Major, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Hin Mak, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mihailo Malowany, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Henry Manes, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Emily Martin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sean Martin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Paul Martino, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Megan Martucci, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Derek Marx, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexander Matzat, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Thomas McCann, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Amanda McClintock, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Charles McDonald, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Asher McGuffin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tracelyn McGuire, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kevin McKeown, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ryan McKeown, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph McManus, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jean-Luc McMurtry, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Taryn McPherson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jason McQuade, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tyler Meacham, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For William Mebane, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alyssa Mehl, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ricardo Melgoza, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kyle Mendenhall, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ignacio Mendez-Nunez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alvaro Mendizabal, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aaron Metviner, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Todd Michael, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ericka Michal, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Amy Miller, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Miller, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Winn Miller, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ryan Millman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Amanda Mitchell, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nikki Modiri, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Keyhan Moini, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Richard Mojica, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicholas Mokover, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Molzahn, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aleesa Monaco, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Edgar Mondragon, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Elizabeth Mooney, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cosme Morga, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Josue Morga, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Stephen Morrison, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kira Moser, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Gregory Mozdyniewicz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Mueller, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Zachary Mullings, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Karthik Munugala, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Victor Muratalla Morales, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Travis Murphy, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Arjang Navab, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexander Nee, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Spencer Neiman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Gary Ngo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew Nguyen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dustin Niblett, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicole Niebrzydowski, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sarah Nikdel, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jae Seong No, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Conor O'Brien, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David O'Connell, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christian Ogren, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Justin O'Hare, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tim Okkema, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lauren Olney, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Grant Olscamp, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christine Ondris, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Corey O'Neill, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dillon Orr, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Osorio, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Zachary Ouellette, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jordan Paddock, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jessica Paek, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kevin Park, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Marina Paske, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sara Paull, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jared Paulo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jasmine Pawlicki, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lindsay Payne, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Thomas Peres, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Anthony Perrotta, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dennis Peterson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ethan Pezzolo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kevin Pham, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Phillips, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alyssa Picard, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kyle Picha, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Charles Pickard, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nathanael Pickslay, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Irene Pinon, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kevin Pormir, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Edgar Portillo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jesse Posehn, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brian Pybas, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Stephen Racca, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Patricia Radis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Shae Rafferty, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Arielle Rahmanan, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Laurel Rain, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Julie Rainey, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jacob Rakosi, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jay Ram, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Steve Ramirez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Norma Ramos, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Rapier, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dmitriy Rapoport, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Debra Ray, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Melanie Redd, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jay Reddy, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christian Reed, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Darlene Reilley, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Hannah Remis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Saila Reyes, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Karen Reynaga, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Justin Rezende, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joshua Rhoades, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Colby Richards, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Paul Richter, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Voltario Rico, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kellie Riggs, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Eric Riley, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Annelise Ringelman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ashley Rits, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sarah Rittenour, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Rivera, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Rivera, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Derek Robbins, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kathryn Robison, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Donald Rodriguez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Steven Rodriguez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For John Rogers, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ryan Romain, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Benjamin Romero, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Isaac Root, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sean Roper, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dara Rosenkrantz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Shoshana Rosenthal, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sean Ross, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Benjamin Rowan, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christine Rowland, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Roy, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Evgenia Royter, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Patrick Rubio, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Denise Rueda, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kurt Ruegg, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Ruelas, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christopher Rutledge, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Danielle Ryder, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ardena Saarinen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Robert Saeman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lauren Saguilig, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Wilfred Salas Jr., Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicholas Samokyszyn, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Sample, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jason Sanbei, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Carissa Sanchez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Remy Sarhan, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lina Sarusal, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ishita Saxena, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kevin Saxman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Emily Schapka, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jake Scheps, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christine Schmitt, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Thomas Schmitt, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Congher Schomburg, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jack Schow, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Thomas Schulte, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Geoff Schuyler, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Schwiebert, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tyler Searls, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Stephanie Seibel, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Luke Sellers, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Shaffer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Samir Shah, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tyler Sherer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Sherman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Monica Sherwood, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kevin Shih, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Reed Showalter, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Daniel Shubat, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Yevgeniy Shuster, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brent Sievers, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Erica Siu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Skarbowski, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brian Skillings, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Slovin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Smeeding, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew Smith, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brittany Smith, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Harrison Smith, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jordan Smith, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Morgan Smith, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Richard Smith, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sophia Smith, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Justin Sola, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Solotke, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lewis Solow-Collins, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Miles Sorel, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Craig Sotebeer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sean Stalhandske, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Zachary Stamplis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jeff Stark, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tomasz Stawicki, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Holly Stehlin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jeffrey Stephens, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexadner Stoffel, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Richard Stofle, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joshua Storms, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rory Strahan-Mauk, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ryan Strauss, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Gregory Stuck, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Emilie Stuebe, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tala Sullivan, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sebastian Swae-Shampine, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ryan Swearingen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cristina Swift, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Deborah Tackett, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rex Tai, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Vanessa Tait, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Samuel Tall, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kristian Talley, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kevin Tan, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tammy Tan, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ronald Tardiff, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Meighan Taylor, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brian Teed, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Etienne Thach, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Robert Thomas, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kayla Thompson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Roy Thompson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Wyatt Thurston, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Robert Thyberg, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Steven Timlin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joanna Titus, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Chezare Torres, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Samuel Torres, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Maria Torruella Suarez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Katrina Tosh, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cody Trevillian, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew Trevino, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kailey-Alyssa Tucker, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Melody Tuttle, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Symeon Tzvetkov, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kimberly Vadelnieks, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Desiree Valadez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Karina Valencia, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Anthony Valente, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jonathan Van Ness, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Amber Vandever (Schlecht), Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tamara Varga, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Polly Varize, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Zachary Vary, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Diana Vega, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kriya Issa Velasco, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Samuel Velie, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Quincy Venter, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Maia Ventura, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Pedro Venzor, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sandeep Verma, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Omar Villa, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nikolay Vinogradov-Nurenberg, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For James Volz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For June Vutrano, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Maya Wagoner, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Robert Wainblat, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Raymond Wang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Bradford Ward, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jessie Watson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Angela Wayne, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Amanda Weber, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Misty Weiner, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Patrick Weinschreider, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jaclyn Weinstein, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Vivian Wenzler, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For James Whalen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Chelsea Whitman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Thomas Wicker, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicholas Wiese, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Anthony Wiggins, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Philip Wilkerson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christopher Wille, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nathaniel Williams, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Conner Wilson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Hannah Wilson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Stella Wilson-Frey, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For John Wiltse, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Saul Winer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Casey Wing, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jacob Winkler, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicholas Winter, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Maxwell Witt, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Audrey Wittrup, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Myles Woerner, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sam Wolfe, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Max Wolff, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicole Wonderly, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Amanda Wong, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Amanda Wood, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jessicah Wood, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brendan Woodruff, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joshua Wright, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Samantha Wright, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Selisa Wright, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jacob Wunsh, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexander Yaldo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Chuqiao Yang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Camryn Yaros, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cynthia Yip, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alyssa Young, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Hope Young, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Peter Young, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Allyn Yu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Gordon Yu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christina Yun, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sierra Zang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cory Zapatka, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Natasha Zaretsky, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicholas Zessis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mo. Zhang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kevin Zhu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Amy Zimmerman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Gregory Zoeller, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Steven Zwick, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, PRO HAC VICE, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Google, Inc., Defendant (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Michael Graham Rhodes, LEAD ATTORNEY, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA; Amy McCowan Smith, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA; Karen Lynn Burhans, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA; Kyle Christopher Wong, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA; Whitty Somvichian, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA.

For Public Citizen, Inc., Amicus (5:16-cv-00473-LHK): Mark Andrew Chavez, LEAD ATTORNEY, Chavez & Gertler LLP, Mill Valley, CA.

For Keith Amaral, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Warren Stramiello, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nanor Aghamal, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jonathon Allen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Samantha Amido, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For John Aragon, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Marc Atiyeh, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Harrison Atkins, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jonathan Bach, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jonathan Baird, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brad Baltutat, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Philip Bartholomew, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Albert Behar, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For James Berent, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Shawn Bianchi, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ana Bolling, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nathan Bou, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cornelius Bouknight, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kyler Breed, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ian Brown, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Bukhin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jurica Bulovic, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Emilia Byun, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Janet Camacho, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Cangiamilla, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sarah Carthwright, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jeremy Castillo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joshua Chang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Krystel Charkowski, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rehman Chaudhry, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Frank Che, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tanner Chel, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jing Chen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dawny Chin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kathryn Chrystal, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexis Cobau, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alana Cobb, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joshua Cohen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sam Cohen, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew Combs, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christopher Cooper, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christine Cory, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jennifer Day, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Victoria De Metz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Krysta Delfino, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Adjani Delgado, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Marcus Deloney, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Rahul Dhodapkar, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Devaki Drozario, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Carson Dunlap, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ziaullah Durrani, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Grace Ellison, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lucia Falcone, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jessica Ford, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicholas Freilich, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Justin Friedman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthieu N. Garlock, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexandra Gilroy, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For John Glines, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Erica Gomez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kyle Grace, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alison Greenberg, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Liang Gu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Adam Gundersheimer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alex Haden, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sharokina Haghee, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brandon Hail, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tessa Hartley, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Emmajean Holley, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brad Hong, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew Houts, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Vanes Ibric, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christine Irish, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nickholas Isber, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Yurie Iwako, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Janice Janeczko, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Miguel Jara, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kacey Jezewski, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Allistair Johnson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Manuel Jurado, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Walter Kikuchi, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cynthia Kim, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael King, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Kirshenbaum, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Natalie Korengold, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dan Kowalczyk, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jesse Kranzler, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Emily Kruger, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Patrick Lachance, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Justice Lammers, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Ike Lee, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Magda Lewandowska, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Gene Li, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dana Lindberg, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jordan Liu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Euthymios Logothetis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Maria Lopez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Harrison Lott, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Gut Macarol, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Manuel Macias, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jordan Mack, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Andrew Macklis, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Gina Mahaz, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Taylor Mansell, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Maxwell McCauley, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nicholas McHardy, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tyler McKinney, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Amanda Mendez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nykki Milano, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jacqueline Millar, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Cory Miller, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Billal Mourtada, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Munkhjin Munkhbaatar, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joshua Nelson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mary Nelson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Soren Nelson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Dennis Neveu, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Simon Northall, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For James Ochse, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Layla Oghabian, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Osazemen Okundaye, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Orr, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Steven Pals, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Patton, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jacob Poteat, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Marquis Prekins-Jaugas, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Irum Qazi, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jessica Rabbany, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Saundra Ramirez, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Diana Rawles, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Ray, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jeffrey Relf, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Elena Roemer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aleksandr Rogozin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Stephany Rogozin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Christopher Rose, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For David Sasson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexander Sawyer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Allison Schneider, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brian Sennett, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jessica Sharples, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Joseph Silver, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Brittany Simon, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Nathaniel Simons, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kanwar Singh, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Bridget Siniakov, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Zi Chuen Soo, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Tiahna Spencer, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alex Spradlin, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Archana Sridhar, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Hal St. Louis-Farrelly, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Staadt, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Kelsey Stegner, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Anne Stellar, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Corrie Stoddard, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Balakrishnan Subramanian, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Victor Sukhovitsky, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jeffrey Sun, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Alexander Surdovel, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jorge Tapia, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Katherine Telma, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Jacqueline Torgerson, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Michael Tucci, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Agata Turowski, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Meghan Uno, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Akshay Verma, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Henry Waldman, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Xiao Jun Wang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Sacha Whedon, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Matthew Williams, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Soyun Won, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Mikhail Yakubovich, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Lihua Zhang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Qiao Zhang, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Aron Goldberger, Plaintiff (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Ray Edwin Gallo, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA; Dominic R Valerian, Gallo LLP, San Rafael, CA.

For Google Inc., Defendant (5:16-cv-02553-LHK): Michael Graham Rhodes, LEAD ATTORNEY, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA; Amy McCowan Smith, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA; Karen Lynn Burhans, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA; Kyle Christopher Wong, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA; Whitty Somvichian, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA.

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO SEVER

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge.

Re: Dkt. No. 96 (No. 16-CV-00473-LHK)

Re: Dkt. No. 20 (No. 16-CV-02553-LHK)

Plaintiffs in these cases, Corley v. Google, Inc. (" Corley " ), and Amacorral v. Google, Inc. (" Amaral " ), are 879 individuals who had Google Apps for Education accounts from November 1, 2010 to April 30, 2014. Plaintiffs allege that Google, Inc. (" Google" ) violated the Wiretap Act by intercepting and scanning Plaintiffs' emails. Before the Court are Google's motions to sever, filed in the Corley and Amaral cases. ECF No. 19 (" FAC" ); ECF No. 96 (" Mot." ); 16-CV-2553, ECF No. 20. With the Court's permission, Public Citizen, Inc. filed an amicus brief opposing Google's motion to sever. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Google's motions to sever.

All docket citations will be to the Corley case unless otherwise noted.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

Google offers customers a " suite of integrated Google products or services" known as " Google Apps." FAC ¶ 10. Google Apps for Education (" GAFE" ) is a customized " version of Google Apps that Google offers to universities and other educational institutions . . . for use by . . . students, faculty, and staff." Id. Among the products and services included in GAFE is Gmail, an email service. Id. GAFE users " receive email accounts and addresses with names that reflect the users' Educational Institution affiliation, not an association with Google-- e.g., jane.doe@berkeley.edu ." Id.

Plaintiffs aver that, from November 1, 2010 until April 30, 2014, Google " scann[ed] and process[ed] the content of every email received by or sent from a Google Apps for Education user account to develop sophisticated individual profiles for Commercial Purposes." Id. ¶ 12. These actions allegedly violated the Wiretap Act, which generally prohibits the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications. 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1).

This is not the first time that GAFE users have brought a Wiretap Act claim against Google. In In re: Google Inc. Gmail Litigation (" Gmail " ), 13-MD-2430 (N.D. Cal.), a multidistrict litigation assigned to the undersigned judge, nine plaintiffs asserted a Wiretap Act claim on behalf of GAFE and non-GAFE Gmail users.

On October 25, 2013, plaintiffs in Gmail moved for " certification of . . . four classes and three subclasses." In re Google Inc. Gmail Litig., 2014 WL 1102660, *10 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2014). One such sub-class, the " Education Class," sought to represent " [a]ll Google Apps for Education users who have, through their Google Apps for Education accounts, sent an email to an '@gmail.com' address or have received an email." Id.

In denying class certification to the Education Class, the Court first noted that the Wiretap Act is not violated if either party to a communication consents to its interception. With this exemption in mind, the Court went on to note that, in order to create a Gmail account, all Gmail users--both GAFE and non-GAFE--had to agree to Google's Terms of Service (" TOS" ) and Privacy Policy. Id. at *3.

From April 16, 2007 to March 1, 2012, Google's TOS stated that it would " pre-screen, review, filter, modify, refuse or remove any or all Content from any Service" --including Gmail--in order to monitor " objectionable" content. Id. From 2010 to March 1, 2012, Google's Privacy Policy stated that, " when you send email or other communications to Google, we may retain those communications in order to process your inquiries, respond to your requests and improve our services." Id. at *4.

After March 1, 2012, Google amended its TOS such that all Gmail users would now have to agree to " give Google . . . a world wide license to use . . . and distribute [user] content." Id. at *3. The Privacy Policy also changed on March 1, 2012, and " stated that Google could collect information that users provided to Google, cookies, log information, user communications to Google, information that users provide to affiliated sites, and the links that a user follows." Id.

In April 2014, after this Court's Gmail order, Google amended its Privacy Policy to state that the email of GAFE and non-GAFE users would be analyzed. Matera v. Google, Inc., 15-CV-4062 (N.D. Cal.), ECF No. 20-2 at 3 (" Our automated systems analyze your content (including emails) to provide you personally relevant product features, such as customized search results, tailored advertising, and spam and malware detection. This analysis occurs as the content is sent, received, and when it is stored." ).

In addition, from 2011 to 2012, Google also maintained a " Privacy Center" website which stated that " Google scans the text of Gmail messages in order to filter spam and detect viruses. The Gmail filtering system also scans keywords in users' email which are then used to match and serve ads." 2014 WL 1102660, *5. From 2009 to 2014, Google maintained other webpages, blogs, and online tools to provide information on its interception and scanning practices. See Id. at *4-*5. There was also media coverage of Google's scanning practices, including New York Times, National Public Radio, and Washington Post articles and reports. Id. at *7.

Aside from these generally applicable disclosures that were made to all Gmail users (both GAFE and non-GAFE), each educational institution appeared to have a unique privacy policy. As noted in Gmail, " the educational institutions with whom Google contracted were . . . required to obtain the necessary authorizations from end users for Google to provide its services." Id. at *5. These authorizations were to disclose, at the very least, the TOS and Privacy Policies described above. However, because Google had a separate contract with each educational institution, " Google [did] not mandate how these educational institutions receive[d] such authorizations, nor [was] that process uniform between various educational institutions." Id. There were " substantial differences between how each of the [educational] institutions approache[d] disclosures," and " it is unclear . . . what disclosures . . . each [GAFE] user saw before registering for an account." Id. ; see also Id. at *15 (" Google had no single policy that required all Google Apps Administrators to provide the same disclosures to end users." ).

" Some institutions' disclosures [were] quite explicit. For example, Western Piedmont Community College [told] its users that 'Google does use software or a " bot" to scan Gmail emails for key words for the purposes of targeted advertising.' Similarly, the University of Alaska state[d] that 'For use in targeted advertising on Google's other sites, and if your email is not encrypted, software (not a person) does scan your mail and compile keywords for advertising.' Meanwhile, other universities, such as the University of the Pacific, merely incorporate[d] Google's disclosures by citing to the TOS and Privacy Policies." Id. (citations and alterations omitted). Moreover, " it is not clear that end users even had to look at these disclosures before they could create their accounts." Id. As a final point, Google contends that, pursuant to certain contractual terms, many educational institutions chose to have " advertisements in GAFE . . . off by default, meaning that advertisements were not displayed to GAFE users unless the GAFE institution affirmatively decided to allow them. Moreover, if a GAFE institution did not affirmatively enable advertisements, any automated scanning of GAFE emails was not used to serve targeted ads in GAFE Gmail or in any other Google service, nor were any 'advertising profiles' made." ECF No. 66 at 4 (footnote omitted).

In light of these circumstances, this Court concluded in Gmail that whether a GAFE user had consented to the interception of his or her communications--and thus whether Google had violated the Wiretap Act--was a question that " must be litigated on an individual, rather than classwide basis." 2014 WL 1102660, *14. Accordingly, plaintiffs in Gmail had failed to satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3), which states that a court may certify a damages class only if " the court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members." Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3). Following the Court's class certification ruling, only the individual plaintiffs' individual claims remained. Google and the individual plaintiffs settled the individual claims and filed stipulations of dismissal as to all cases. The case was closed on July 14, 2014.

B. Procedural History

On January 27, 2016, Plaintiffs filed the original complaint in Corley. ECF No. 1. There were four Plaintiffs in the original complaint, all of whom were current or former students of the University of California, Berkeley (" Berkeley" ). These Plaintiffs were Ryan Corley, William Dormann, Shannon Mehaffey, and Teddey Xiao. On February 8, 2016, Plaintiffs' counsel filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as to Teddey Xiao. ECF No. 12.

Corley was originally assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins, but was related to Gmail, and reassigned to the undersigned judge on February 12, 2016. On March 11, 2016, Plaintiffs' counsel in Corley sought leave to file the FAC in order to add " an additional 700 plaintiffs." ECF No. 18 at 2. On March 16, 2016, without obtaining leave from the Court, Plaintiffs' counsel filed the FAC.

Because this Court had not previously overseen a case involving more than 700 Plaintiffs, the Court set an initial case management conference for April 20, 2016 to discuss with the parties " how best to manage this case" going forward. ECF No. 58 at 2.

In the parties' case management statement, Plaintiffs proposed a discovery plan in which Plaintiffs' counsel wanted to proceed effectively as a class action: " Discovery should proceed as to . . . a representative sample of the Plaintiffs . . . [which] should help to value and settle any remaining cases." ECF No. 66 at 13.

At the case management conference itself, Plaintiffs' counsel acknowledged that the Gmail class certification order influenced Plaintiffs' decision to bring an action with 700 individual Plaintiffs. ECF No. 74-1 (" Hr'g Tr." ) at 5 (" There are issues raised by your [ Gmail ] order that are in play, yes." ). Further, when asked why Plaintiffs' counsel did not file individual cases, Plaintiffs' counsel stated that " [t]hey're all the same essential claim arising out of the same essential facts." Id. at 9.

However, on consent, Plaintiffs' counsel acknowledged that " [t]here may be differences based on school" in terms of what information each Plaintiff saw and what each Plaintiff knew about Google's email scanning practices. Id. at 9. Plaintiffs' counsel conceded that " consent may be individual in certain ways," and there " may be some unique differences based on who read what [and] when that are totally individual." Id. at 8, 9. Plaintiffs' counsel thus acknowledged that the predominance issues in Gmail would also be an issue in Corley.

In addition, Google argued that the FAC lacked sufficient information as to each Plaintiff. The FAC did not, for instance, give " individual e-mail addresses" for each Plaintiff. Id. at 34. Without this information, Google could not gather data or determine how to marshal a proper defense as to each Plaintiff. See Id. at 15 (" There's a lot of just basic biographical data that we would want to get our hands on sooner than later." ).

During the case management conference, the Court commented that the FAC appeared to be " trying to circumvent Rule 23," the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure governing class certification. Id. at 42.

At the April 20, 2016 initial case management conference, Google stated that it had ceased scanning emails of GAFE users on April 30, 2014. Id. at 17. The Wiretap Act is subject to a two-year statute of limitations. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' counsel stated, also at the initial case management conference, that he would file another case which would allege a Wiretap Act claim against Google by several hundred more plaintiffs. Id. at 23 (Google's counsel noting that he understood that Plaintiffs' counsel would " add another 100 or 200 people to the case); Id. at 32 (Plaintiffs' counsel stating that he had 855 total clients, of which approximately 700 were named in the FAC). The Court responded that Plaintiffs could not file such an action in federal court, because doing so would be " improper." Hr'g Tr. at 33. Plaintiffs' counsel then stated that he would " file it in Superior Court and presumably Google will remove it." Id. at 32.

Following the initial case management conference, the Court ordered the parties to file briefs addressing the propriety of mass joinder. ECF No. 69 at 1. The Court also scheduled a further case management conference for April 28, 2016. Id. Plaintiffs filed their brief on mass joinder on April 25, 2016, ECF No. 74, and Google filed its brief on April 26, 2016, ECF No. 77.

At the April 28, 2016 case management conference, Plaintiffs' counsel confirmed that he would file a separate action with more than a hundred Plaintiffs in state court. See also ECF No. 85 at 4 (Plaintiffs' counsel stating that he would " file [the additional] claims separately in state court." ). After reviewing the parties' briefs and learning about Plaintiffs' counsel's decision to file a separate action in state court, the Court invited Google at the April 28, 2016 case management conference to file a motion to sever. ECF No. 85.

Plaintiffs' subsequently filed a case with 175 Plaintiffs-- Amaral --in Santa Clara County Superior Court on April 29, 2016. Google removed Amaral to federal court on May 11, 2016, and Amaral was related to Corley on May 18, 2016. 16-CV-2553, ECF Nos. 1 & 15.

Google moved to sever on May 18, 2016 in Corley and on June 1, 2016 in Amaral. Google's motion in Amaral states that " the Court should . . . sever the claims of the individual Plaintiffs in the present Amaral complaint" for " all the reasons set forth in the Corley Motion." 16-CV-2553, ECF No. 20 at 2. There is no independent legal analysis in the Amaral motion. Plaintiffs filed responses to both motions on July 6, 2016, and Google filed its replies on July 27, 2016. ECF No. 121 (" Opp'n" ); ECF No. 123 (" Reply" ). On June 21, 2016, Public Citizen, Inc. (" Public Citizen" ) moved to file an amicus brief opposing Google's motion to sever. ECF No. 114. The Court granted Public Citizen's motion on June 23, 2016, and Public Citizen filed its amicus brief on June 24, 2016. ECF No. 118 (" Public Citizen Opp'n" ). The Court held a case management conference on August 18, 2016 addressing options to move this litigation forward if the Court were to find misjoinder. ECF No. 133.

II. LEGAL STANDARD

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a), permissive joinder of plaintiffs is appropriate where (1) " any right to relief [is asserted] jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and (2), " any question of law or fact common to all plaintiffs will arise in the action." Fed.R.Civ.P. 20(a). " Even once these requirements are met, a district court must examine whether permissive joinder would comport with the principles of fundamental fairness or would result in prejudice to either side." Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1296 (9th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks omitted). " A determination on the question of joinder of parties lies within the discretion of the district court." Wynn v. Nat. Broadcasting Co., 234 F.Supp.2d 1067, 1078 (C.D. Cal. 2002); see also Acevedo v. Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc., 600 F.3d 516, 522 (5th Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (" [D]istrict courts have considerable discretion to deny joinder when it would not facilitate judicial economy and when different witnesses and documentary proof would be required for plaintiffs' claims." ). The rules regarding permissive joinder are " to be construed liberally in order to promote trial convenience and to expedite the final determination of disputes." League to Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Reg. Planning Agency, 558 F.2d 914, 917 (9th Cir. 1977).

III. DISCUSSION

The Court begins by examining the first Rule 20(a) requirement--whether Plaintiffs' right to relief arises out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. Because Plaintiffs have not met this requirement, the Court need not consider whether Plaintiffs satisfy the second Rule 20(a) requirement: that there be a common question of law or fact. Aside from these two Rule 20(a) requirements, the Court also explains why mass joinder would be fundamentally unfair. Finally, the Court addresses how this litigation should move forward.

In this Order, the Court abbreviates this requirement as the " same transaction or occurrence" requirement.

A. Same Transaction or Occurrence Requirement

1. Legal Framework

On the same transaction or occurrence requirement, the Ninth Circuit has held that " this provision requires factual similarity in the allegations supporting [p]laintiffs' claims." Visendi v. Bank of Am., N.A., 733 F.3d 863, 870 (9th Cir. 2013). Other courts have likewise determined that there must be a logical relationship between events, In re Prempro Prods. Liab. Litig., 591 F.3d 613, 622 (8th Cir. 2010), and " that joinder is not appropriate where different products or processes are involved," In re EMC Corp., 677 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

With this guidance in mind, the Ninth Circuit, in Visendi v. Bank of America, determined that joinder was improper where a group of 160 named plaintiffs sued 15 different defendants for illicit lending practices. 733 F.3d at 866. The Visendi court held that plaintiffs' " loans [had been] secured by separate properties scattered across the country, and some of the properties, but not all, [had been] sold in foreclosure." Id. at 870. Thus, " [w]hile Plaintiffs allege in conclusory fashion that [d]efendants' misconduct was 'regular and systematic,' their interactions with [d]efendants were not [in fact] uniform." Id. Accordingly, the Visendi court determined that plaintiffs' allegations did not arise from a single transaction or occurrence: they arose from different loans, made by different lenders, on different properties, in different parts of the country.

Similarly, in Coughlin v. Rogers, 130 F.3d 1348 (9th Cir. 1997), plaintiffs brought suit against the Immigration and Naturalization Service (" INS" ) and its then-Director, Richard Rogers. Id. at 1349. The gist of plaintiffs' complaint was that " defendants have unreasonably delayed [the] adjudicat[ion] [of] plaintiffs' applications and petitions." Id. These applications and petitions, however, were significantly different from one another. Some petitions had been made by U.S. citizens, others by aliens. Some applications sought relief for the applicant, while others sought relief for a spouse or child. On these facts, the district court found that plaintiffs' claims did not arise from the same transaction or occurrence: " [e]ach [p]laintiff has waited a different length of time, suffering a different duration of alleged delay." Id. at 1350. " Furthermore, the delay is disputed in some instances and varies from case to case. And, most importantly, there may be numerous reasons for the alleged delay." Id. Thus, " [e]ach" plaintiff's claim " raises potentially different issues, and must be viewed in a separate and individual light by the [c]ourt." Id. at 1351. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit held that the district court's ruling was consistent " with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 20 and 21 and the precedent on severance." Id.

Although the Ninth Circuit has not addressed the propriety of joinder in a case involving as many as 879 Plaintiffs, several district courts in the Ninth Circuit have done so. In On the Cheap, LLC v. Does 1-5011, 280 F.R.D. 500 (N.D. Cal. 2011), for example, the district court held that plaintiff had failed to satisfy the same transaction or occurrence requirement in bringing suit against 5000 Doe defendants over copyright infringement. As the court pointed out, defendants in On the Cheap would " likely raise different factual and legal defenses," because the allegations made against them were all somewhat different. Id. " Because the large number of defendants with individual issues will create 'scores of mini-trials involving different evidence and testimony' and complicate the issues for all those involved, it is more efficient to proceed with separate cases where there will be separate proceedings, including separate motion hearings and ADR efforts." Id. at 503. Other district courts are in accord with the reasoning in On the Cheap. See, e.g., WiAV Networks, LLC v. 3Com Corp., 2010 WL 3895047, *2 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2010) (" Each defendant has simply been thrown into a mass pit with others to suit plaintiff's convenience. In this connection, the accused defendants--who will surely have competing interests and strategies--are also entitled to present individualized assaults on questions of non-infringement, invalidity, and claim construction" ).

The Court notes that the FAC names 200,000 Doe Defendants. The FAC makes no specific allegations as to these Doe Defendants. It simply states that these Defendants are " principals, agents, partners, affiliates, officers, directors, shareholders, creditors, members, employees, managers, joint venturers, co-venturers, and/or co-conspirators . . . and were act[ing] within the . . . scope of their agency" in assisting Google. FAC ¶ 5. The holding in On the Cheap --that 5,000 Doe defendants were unmanageable and were misjoined--may therefore apply with equal or greater force here, where there are 200,000 Doe Defendants. Moreover, under Ninth Circuit law, " [a]s a general rule, the use of 'John Doe' to identify a defendant is not favored." Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980). Google, however, does not move for misjoinder of Defendants, but reserves the right to do so at a later time. Mot. at 7 n.5. Under these circumstances, the Court does not address misjoinder of Doe Defendants at this time.

In addition, consistent with On the Cheap, a number of circuit courts have found joinder of hundreds or thousands of parties inappropriate. In AF Holdings, LLC v. Does 1-1058, 752 F.3d 990, 410 U.S.App.D.C. 41 (D.C. Cir. 2014), for example, the D.C. Circuit rejected plaintiffs' attempt to join 1058 Doe defendants together for purposes of asserting a copyright infringement claim. As in On the Cheap, the crux of plaintiffs' contention in AF Holdings was that plaintiffs owned a copyrighted work which had been downloaded numerous times by defendants through an online filesharing program. As the D.C. Circuit explained, two " users who download the same file months apart are like two individuals who play at the same blackjack table at different times. They may have won the same amount of money, employed the same strategy, and perhaps even played with the same dealer, but they have still engaged in entirely separate transactions. And simply committing the same type of violation in the same way does not link defendants together for the purposes of joinder." Id. at 997-98 (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted).

Looking outside the filesharing context, in Acevedo v. Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc., the Fifth Circuit determined that the district court properly exercised its discretion in denying joinder to 800 " current or former employees of Allsup's Convenience Stores." 600 F.3d at 518. These 800 employees sought to bring wage and hour claims against defendant. As the Fifth Circuit pointed out, however, " plaintiffs work or have worked across a network of more than 300 stores, each with its own manager responsible for implementing Allsup's policies." Id. at 522. " [C]onditions do not appear to have been uniform at all Allsup's stores." Id. Thus, " given the divergent working condictions at each store and the different defenses applicable to each plaintiff's claims," mass joinder was improper. Id. ; see also id. (noting that joinder would be inefficient, as it would be " too challenging logistically" ). Notably, the Fifth Circuit observed that plaintiffs in Acevedo had " fail[ed] to cite any cases in which a group of plaintiffs even remotely as numerous as 800 were able to join their claims." Id.

Two common themes link Visendi, Coughlin, On the Cheap, AF Holdings, and Acevedo together. First, the single transaction or occurrence requirement is not met where plaintiffs would have to prove their claims or defendants would have to litigate their defenses on an individualized basis. Second, the impropriety of joinder is magnified in situations where there are hundreds or thousands of parties, as these situations burden, rather than facilitate, judicial economy.

2. Application

These two principles govern the Court's disposition of the instant motions. As noted in Gmail, " [t]he question of whether Class members have consented to the alleged interceptions has been central to this case since its inception.", 2014 WL 1102660, *13; see also id. (" The consent exception remains one of the principal disputed issues in this case." ). Consent is also central to the instant actions: Google has, since the initial case management conference, stated that it would challenge whether Plaintiffs had consented to Google's interception and scanning practices. Consent may be either express or implied, but both express and implied consent are questions of fact. Id. Id. at *15 (" [T]he question of express consent is usually a question of fact, where a fact-finder needs to interpret the express terms of any agreements to determine whether these agreements adequately notify individuals regarding the interceptions." ); Id. at *16 (" Implied consent is an intensely factual question that requires consideration of the circumstances surrounding the interception to divine whether the party whose communication was intercepted was on notice that the communication would be intercepted." ).

The fact-specific nature of the consent inquiry defeated class certification in Gmail, as " [t]he individualized questions with respect to consent, which will likely be Google's principal affirmative defense, [were] likely to overwhelm any common issues." Id. at *21. This inquiry also defeats mass joinder here. The " intensely individualized" nature of consent means that the 879 Plaintiffs' individual claims do not satisfy the same transaction or occurrence requirement. The consent analysis instead requires an examination of many different transactions or occurrences.

Indeed, consent is particularly fraught as it applies to GAFE users, because each educational institution had a unique contract with Google. This is a fact that Plaintiffs' counsel acknowledged at the initial case management conference: " consent may be individual in certain ways," and " there may be differences based on school, there may be differences based on time period, there may be some unique differences based on who read what [and] when that are totally individual." Hr'g Tr. at 5-6.

These differences are also readily apparent from the FAC in the instant cases: " Google did not mandate how these Educational Institutions obtained these authorizations, and the disclosures and authorizations regarding GAFE naturally varied by school." FAC ¶ 20. The FAC further alleges that, " many Educational Institutions directed students to the school's own privacy or use policies, some to Terms of use specifically agreed-upon by the Education Institution and Google, others to the Google Apps for Education Terms of Service and/or Privacy Policy, yet others to the general Google Terms of Service and/or Privacy Policies." Id. ¶ 21.

The FAC describes the variations in the disclosures of some educational institutions. For example, in response to whether Google would " search our mail for marketing purposes," the University of Maine (" Maine" ) stated: " No. The education agreement prohibits that activity." Id. ¶ 23(7). The University of Arizona (" UA" ) stated that " CatMail allows you to send and receive email with all the Google tools . . . plus full privacy of your information and no ads." Id. ¶ 23(6). It is unclear whether " full privacy" included privacy from email scanning. Similarly, Google's contract with Yale University (" Yale" ) " guarantee[d] privacy and confidentiality in ways that are analogous to the way Yale currently provides email services," but did not identify what privacy protections Yale's current email service provided. Id. ¶ 23(5).

Aside from institutions like Maine, UA, and Yale, the FAC also states that some educational institutions simply " directed students to . . . the general Google Terms of Service and/or Privacy Policy." FAC ¶ 21. Those TOS and Privacy Policies, however, changed multiple times between 2010 and 2014. On March 1, 2012, Google amended its TOS such that all Gmail users would now have to agree to " give Google . . . a worldwide license to use . . . and distribute [user] content." Id. at *3. 2014 WL 1102660, *3. That same day, the Privacy Policy was also changed to state " that Google could collect information that users provided to Google, cookies, log information, user communications to Google, information that users provide to affiliated sites, and the links that a user follows." Id. The Privacy Policy was changed again in April 2014, after the Court's Gmail class certification order, to inform users that " [o]ur automated systems analyze your content (including emails) to provide you personally relevant product features, such as customized search results, tailored advertising, and spam and malware detection." 15-CV-4062, ECF No. 20-2 at 3. Thus, any analysis of consent would have to address the specific TOS and Privacy Policies in effect at specific times.

In In re Google, Inc., 2013 WL 5423918, *14 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 26, 2013), the Court held that " a reasonable Gmail user [who] read" the amendments to the TOS and Privacy Policy on March 1, 2012 " would not have necessarily [have] understood that her emails were being intercepted to create user profiles or to provide targeted advertisements."

Finally, according to Google, many educational institutions agreed, as a default, that GAFE users would not be subject to targeted advertising and that Google would not scan email sent or received by a GAFE user. See ECF No. 66 at 4 (" [I]f a GAFE institution did not affirmatively enable advertisements, any automated scanning of GAFE emails was not used to serve targeted ads in GAFE Gmail or in any other Google service, nor were any 'advertising profiles' made." ). In order to enable scanning, the educational institutions themselves or GAFE users at these educational institutions had to affirmatively change these default settings.

This dissimilarity reflects the individual contracts that each educational institution had with Google. See FAC ¶ 23(12) (" NYU Google Apps for education is offered by Google to NYU in accordance with a specially negotiated end-user license agreement." ) (emphasis added). These differences impacted what Google scanned and analyzed, what disclosures each Plaintiff read, and whether any particular Plaintiff consented to Google's practices. As this Court has explained in Gmail, the " consent of Education Class members is likely to require individualized inquiries. . . . Google had no single policy that required all Google Apps Administrators to provide the same disclosures to end users. This means that the end users received vastly different disclosures depending on with which educational institution they were affiliated." 2014 WL 1102660, *15. Put another way, each school had its own contract with Google, and these contracts appear to have provided different disclosures.

Based on this information, Plaintiffs at each educational institution (1) might not have consented to Google's scanning practices, (2) might have opted out of Google's scanning practices by changing their Gmail settings or choosing a different email provider, or (3) might have consented to Google's scanning practices. As Google notes, in order to defend itself, Google would need to undertake " a highly individualized" analysis to investigate, research, and present defenses as to each Plaintiff. Mot. at 10. This type of investigation made class treatment inappropriate. It also makes mass joinder inappropriate. For the 879 Plaintiffs, spread across twenty one educational institutions, Google would need to answer a set of different questions. These questions might include:

o Did a particular Plaintiff's educational institution have a specific privacy policy, or did it direct users to Google's general TOS and Privacy Policies?

o What did each institution's privacy policy disclose or authorize?

o Did the particular Plaintiff actually read the policies at issue?

o Did an educational institution's privacy policies change over time? Which version or versions of an educational institution's privacy policy did the particular Plaintiff read?

o Did an educational institution allow its users to change GAFE settings to prevent or enable email scanning?

o Did the particular Plaintiff hear about Google's interception practices from any another source, such as a Gmail-related privacy notice or a publicly-available news article?

Courts have recognized that the predominance analysis under Rule 23(b) and the single transaction or occurrence analysis under Rule 20(a) may, in some instances, be two sides of the same coin. In In re EMC Corp., for instance, defendants sought to sever themselves from eighteen other companies that were named in a single complaint. 677 F.3d at 1353. In evaluating defendants' arguments, the Federal Circuit examined an " analogous" Fifth Circuit decision where the Fifth Circuit had determined that plaintiffs had " not established that the questions of law or fact common to the members of the class predominate over any questions affecting individual members as required by Rule 23(b)(3)." Id. at 1355. The Federal Circuit acknowledged that " [t]he procedural safeguards pertaining to class certification do not [technically] apply" in a joinder case. Id. Nevertheless, as the Federal Circuit explained, " Rule 20's requirements are designed to prevent similar unfairness." Id. " Like the requirements of Rule 23 in class actions, Rule 20's two requirements--that the claims share questions of law or fact common to all defendants, and arise out of the same transaction or occurrence--help ensure that the scope of the action remains consistent with fairness to the parties." Id. (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted).

Here, the reasoning in In re EMC is particularly relevant because Plaintiffs' counsel has acknowledged that the Corley and Amaral cases are " much like . . . class action[s]." ECF No. 74 at 7. Plaintiffs' counsel, moreover, has acknowledged that the Corley and Amaral cases were brought to avoid the reach of Gmail. In opposing the instant motions, for instance, Plaintiffs' counsel has stated that " Plaintiffs seek to litigate their claims . . . consistent with the law, in light of the unavailability of class treatment." Opp'n at 1 (emphasis added). Moreover, Plaintiffs' counsel has stated that discovery should proceed in a manner that mimics discovery in a class action: " [d]iscovery should . . . focus on a representative sample of Plaintiffs," which would culminate in a limited set of " bellwether trials." ECF No. 131 at 4. Plaintiffs concede that " [d]eposing all 879 Plaintiffs before trying the first case is a waste of resources for the Parties and the Court." Id.

Given these circumstances, the Court's Rule 23(b)(3) predominance analysis and Rule 20(a) same transaction or occurrence analysis reach the same result. As before in Gmail, Google must have the opportunity to fully and fairly litigate against each Plaintiff in this case. That opportunity allows Google to review and present defenses against each Plaintiff, given the individualized nature of the consent exemption. Thus, the Wiretap Act claims of the 879 Plaintiffs do not arise from the same transaction or occurrence, and Plaintiffs have been misjoined.

3. Plaintiffs' and Public Citizen's Contentions

Plaintiffs and Public Citizen present three arguments in response to this conclusion. First, they point out that some courts have denied class certification but have nonetheless found joinder to be appropriate. Second, Plaintiffs and Public Citizen argue that Rule 20(a) is satisfied because " Google had a uniform policy of intercepting and processing the content of . . . email[]." Public Citizen Opp'n at 7. Third, Plaintiffs and Public Citizen cite the Court's prior rulings in the McAfee v. Francis litigation. As discussed below, these arguments lack merit.

a. Predominance and Joinder

According to Public Citizen, the Court's predominance analysis in Gmail does not necessarily foreclose joinder here. To support this point, Public Citizen cites several cases where courts " have allowed joinder under Rule 20 after denying class certification under Rule 23." Public Citizen Opp'n at 5.

In Bryant v. Service Corp. International, 801 F.Supp.2d 898, 900 (N.D. Cal. 2011), the court denied class certification to a putative class of current and former Service Corp. employees. There were twelve plaintiffs in Bryant. After the court denied class certification, the court severed the eight plaintiffs who did not reside in California. The district court, in its discretion, declined to sever the four California plaintiffs. Similarly, in Rochlin v. Cincinnati Insurance Co., 2003 WL 21852341, *3--*4 (S.D. Ind. July 8, 2003), Weigele v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 2010 WL 3069213, *1 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2010), and Luna v. Del Monte Fresh Produce (Southeast), Inc., 2009 WL 4801357, *1 (N.D.Ga. Dec. 10, 2009), the courts agreed to join 9, 25, and 52 employees of a single employer, respectively.

None of the foregoing cases involved an attempt to join 879 Plaintiffs at 21 different educational institutions together. The largest number any court permitted in terms of joinder was 52, in Luna. Furthermore, these cases involve employees suing the same employer for wage, hour, or other labor violations. In such circumstances, the parties may well be able " to take advantage of the efficiencies of common discovery and joint proceedings" --there might have, for instance, been a single employment contract or collective bargaining agreement. Weigele, 2010 WL 3069213, *2. In the instant actions, on the other hand, there are no such economies of scale. There are 21 contracts, one for each educational institution. There is uncertainty as to what each Plaintiff saw, whether a Plaintiff agreed to a particular disclosure, and whether a Plaintiff might have learned about Google's practices from other sources, such as media coverage. Plaintiffs' counsel conceded this point and stated at the initial case management conference that " consent may be individual in certain ways," and there " may be some unique differences based on who read what [and] when that are totally individual." Hr'g Tr. at 8, 9. Based upon these differences, Google intends to examine each Plaintiff's Wiretap Act claim on an individualized basis in order to determine whether a Plaintiff expressly or impliedly consented to Google's practices. The employer-employee cases cited by Public Citizen are therefore inapposite, and the Court declines to follow them here.

b. Uniform Policy

Next, Plaintiffs and Public Citizen claim that Google had a uniform policy of intercepting and scanning email. However, Google contends that, " [s]ince GAFE was launched, advertisements in GAFE Gmail have been off by default, meaning that advertisements were not displayed to GAFE users unless the GAFE institution affirmatively decided to allow them. Moreover, if a GAFE institution did not affirmatively enable advertisements, any automated scanning of GAFE emails was not used to serve targeted ads in GAFE Gmail or in any other Google service, nor were any 'advertising profiles' made." ECF No. 66 at 4 (footnote omitted). Thus, different educational institutions may have had different scanning policies.

Furthermore, even if Google had a uniform scanning policy across all educational institutions, each educational institution had its own privacy policy that included different authorizations and disclosures. The instant actions are therefore distinguishable from three decisions cited by Plaintiffs and Public Citizen: United States v. Mississippi, 380 U.S. 128, 85 S.Ct. 808, 13 L.Ed.2d 717 (1965), Nelson-Devlin v. Eli Lilly and Co., 2015 WL 5436700 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2015), and Allen v. Similasan Corp., 2013 WL 2120825 (S.D. Cal. May 14, 2013).

In Mississippi, plaintiff alleged that Mississippi had implemented a systemic, uniform plan to restrict the African American vote, implemented via certain statewide voting procedures. The U.S. Supreme Court held that joinder of six county registrars was proper because " the registrars had acted and were continuing to act as part of a state-wide system designed to enforce the registration laws in a way that would . . . deprive colored people of the right to vote." 380 U.S. at 142. Similarly, in Nelson-Devlin, the district court found joinder of plaintiffs proper because the warnings accompanying prescriptions of a specific drug were found to be identical. Likewise, in Allen, the plaintiffs had purchased the same product after reviewing the same " product[] packaging" and the same advertisements on a website. 2013 WL 2120825, *2.

Unlike this trio of cases, the instant cases involve potentially different scanning policies across different educational institutions as well as different authorizations and disclosures. Consequently, legal authority upholding joinder in Mississippi, Nelson-Devlin, and Allen, which involved a uniform policy, is inapplicable here.

c. McAfee Litigation

Finally, Plaintiffs and Public Citizen make much of this Court's decisions in McAfee v. Francis. In McAfee v. Francis (" McAfee I " ), 2011 WL 3293759 (N.D. Cal. Aug 1, 2011), three plaintiffs originally brought breach of contract claims against a single defendant. The Court granted defendant's motion to dismiss without prejudice because plaintiffs did not contest defendant's arguments on the merits; plaintiffs simply requested leave to amend. In dicta, the Court observed that joinder appeared improper because it appeared that the plaintiffs had separate contracts with defendant. Id. at *3.

Plaintiffs thereafter filed an amended complaint, and defendant once again moved to dismiss. Notably, in the amended complaint, plaintiffs asserted claims for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud. The Court granted in part and denied in part defendant's second motion to dismiss in McAfee v. Francis (" McAfee II " ), 2012 WL 762118 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2012). On joinder, the Court held that plaintiffs' breach of contract claims were " predicated on different transactions and occurrences," as each plaintiff had a separate contract with each defendant. " However, some courts have concluded that even when the underlying contract claims are predicated on different transactions and occurrences, allegations of fraud and misrepresentation may constitute a transaction or series of transactions under Rule 20(a) when they are part of a common scheme." Id. The Court agreed with this approach, and held that the amended complaint's allegations of a common fraudulent scheme were sufficient to constitute a " logical relationship" for purposes of Rule 20(a). Id.

Unlike McAfee, violations of the Wiretap Act do not sound in fraud. As the Third Circuit has explained, " [t]he Wiretap Act is a wiretapping statute, and just because a scenario sounds in fraud or deceit does not mean it sounds in wiretapping." In re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Cons. Privacy Litig., 806 F.3d 125, 144 (3d Cir. 2015). Neither Plaintiffs nor Public Citizen cites any case where courts have applied the " fraud" or " misrepresentation" rule employed in McAfee II to the Wiretap Act, and the Court has found none in its own research.

To summarize, because Plaintiffs have failed to meet the same transaction or occurrence requirement, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have been misjoined in the Corley and Amaral cases. Because Plaintiffs have not met the same transaction or occurrence requirement, the Court need not address whether Plaintiffs have satisfied Rule 20(a)'s second requirement--that there be a common question of law or fact.

The Court notes that Google's briefing does not develop any specific arguments in response to the common question of law or fact requirement. See Reply at 3 (challenging only same transaction or occurrence requirement). Moreover, Google did not challenge commonality in opposing class certification, and some courts have held that Rule 23(a)(2)'s commonality requirement and Rule 20(a)'s common question of law or fact requirement are one and the same. See Lowery v. Ala. Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184, 1202 n.46 (11th Cir. 2007) (treating 23(a)(2) and Rule 20(a) as functionally equivalent) (citations omitted). Under these circumstances, the Court would likely find that Plaintiffs had satisfied Rule 20(a)'s common question of law or fact requirement.

B. Fundamental Fairness

As noted above, the Court may, in the interest of fundamental fairness and justice, dismiss or sever parties even if the Rule 20(a) requirements are satisfied. Here, the Court finds that, if the Corley and Amaral actions were to proceed as is, joinder (1) would cause prejudice to Google and result in jury confusion, (2) would be impractical, and (3) would avoid proper payment of fees. For these reasons, the Court finds that dismissal or severance would better comport with principles of fundamental fairness and would better advance the administration of justice.

1. Prejudice to Google and Jury Confusion

First, keeping 879 Plaintiffs in these actions would cause significant prejudice to Google. Indeed, several courts have found substantial prejudice where a " defendant's defense would, in effect, require [hundreds of] mini-trial[s]." Hard Drive Prods., Inc. v. Does 1-188, 809 F.Supp.2d 1150, 1164 (N.D. Cal. 2011). In addition, in evaluating the likelihood of prejudice, the Ninth Circuit has advised courts to consider the " danger of jury confusion." Coleman, 232 F.3d at 1296. Thus, in Coleman, the Ninth Circuit determined that certain plaintiffs were misjoined where all ten plaintiffs had alleged age discrimination against the same employer. Id. As the Ninth Circuit explained, defendant " would be prejudiced by having all ten plaintiffs testify in [a single] trial" because " even the strongest jury instructions [can] not . . . dull[] the impact of a parade of witnesses, each recounting his contention that defendant laid him off because of his age." Id.

Both concerns--the potential for hundreds of mini-trials and the likelihood of jury confusion--are at play here. As has been discussed, if all 879 Plaintiffs were to remain joined, Google would potentially have to take discovery of each Plaintiff, investigate the disclosures made by each educational institution, and determine whether to file hundreds if not thousands of pretrial motions. All of these obstacles have been magnified even more by the deficiencies in the FAC. As Google's counsel has noted, the FAC does not provide Plaintiffs' individual e-mail addresses. Hr'g Tr. at 31. It is therefore difficult, if not impossible, for Google to " try to answer" Plaintiffs' claims. Id. In moving to sever, Google reiterates that " the sheer volume of Plaintiffs and GAFE institutions, each with different fact patterns requiring review for liability and damages, would prejudice Google . . . if Plaintiffs' claims were tried together." Mot. at 10.

Moreover, on jury confusion, the Court notes that if this case were to go to trial, and if Google were to argue the consent exception, the jury would potentially have to keep track of the facts and circumstances of 879 different Plaintiffs. Moreover, the jury would have to consider and analyze different privacy policies to reflect the diversity of disclosures in this litigation. See Wynn, 234 F.Supp.2d at 1089 (" A single trial would present the jury with the hopeless task of trying to discern who did and said what to whom and for what reason." ).

Plaintiffs do not present a persuasive counterargument to this point. In fact, Plaintiffs simply contend that few cases go to trial, and that the Court need not consider jury confusion at this stage of litigation. Plaintiffs' arguments fail to comport with Ninth Circuit precedent, which expressly instructs courts to consider the risk of jury confusion in evaluating prejudice to the parties when analyzing misjoinder. See Coleman, 232 F.3d at 1296 (stating that court should examine " danger of jury confusion" in misjoinder analysis). Further, any additional delay on the issue of joinder would only cause the Court and the parties more difficulty in the future, as this action moves through fact and expert discovery, pretrial proceedings, and trial. Accordingly, contrary to Plaintiffs' contentions, the Court finds that jury confusion and unfair prejudice to Google would result if all 879 Plaintiffs remained in these two actions.

2. Impracticality of Joinder

Second, it would be impractical to litigate all 879 Plaintiffs' claims together. The sheer number of Plaintiffs, combined with their geographic diversity, would impede effective case management and would not promote judicial economy.

As to the sheer number of Plaintiffs, the Court finds instructive the Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. 11C Music, 202 F.R.D. 229 (M.D. Tenn. 2001), decision. In Bridgeport, the court granted defendants' motion to sever 770 plaintiffs. In so doing, the court noted that, " [a]s a practical matter, this case is unmanageable in its current form." Id. at 232. " Because this Court's courtroom would seat only a small fraction of [d]efendants and their attorneys, it cannot even hold a hearing on the motions currently pending; it cannot host a management conference; it certainly cannot try all--or even most--of the [p]laintiffs' counts together." Id. ; see also Hard Drive Prods., 809 F.Supp.2d at 1164 (finding misjoinder based on presence of 188 defendants).

The instant action, which involves 879 Plaintiffs, would present even more logistical hurdles than in Bridgeport. Plaintiffs' counsel, indeed, has already admitted that it would be both impractical and inefficient to require that all 879 Plaintiffs be deposed. Plaintiffs' counsel, moreover, has provided no plan as to what the Court should do if all 879 Plaintiffs were required to attend a pretrial hearing or if all (or even a fraction of the) 879 Plaintiffs elected to attend trial.

Case law interpreting Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(1), commonly known as the numerosity requirement, provides yet another indicator as to the impracticality of joinder. This requirement states that " [o]ne or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all members only if the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable." Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(1). There is no " 'magic number' that will satisfy the Rule 23(a)(1) prerequisite in every case." Newberg on Class Actions § 3:12 (5th ed. 2016). " As a general guideline, however," a class " of 40 or more members raises a presumption of impracticability of joinder." Id. ; see, e.g., Pa. Pub. Sch. Emps. Ret. Sys. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 772 F.3d 111, 120 (2d Cir. 2014) (" Numerosity is presumed for classes larger than forty members." ); Hernandez v. Cnty. of Monterey, 305 F.R.D. 132, 153 (N.D. Cal. 2015) (same); Huynh v. Harasz, 2015 WL 7015567, *5 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2015) (same). Having 879 Plaintiffs spread across two case dockets far exceeds this general guideline, particularly given the individualized inquiries necessary in the instant cases.

Aside from the total number of Plaintiffs, the Court also observes that Plaintiffs reside in states across the country, from Massachusetts to Ohio to California. FAC ¶ 17(1), 17(6), 17(450). Numerous courts have held that, " [i]n assessing impracticality of joinder," the court should " consider factors such as the geographical diversity of [parties]." McCluskey v. Trs. of Red Dot Corp. Emp. Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, 268 F.R.D. 670, 674 (W.D. Wash. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Pole v. Estenson Logistics, LLC, 2016 WL 4238635, *5 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2016) (same). Geographic diversity may make it more difficult for the Court to hold hearings, for the parties to conduct discovery, and for the parties to attend trial and pretrial proceedings. Hence, the geographic diversity of Plaintiffs weighs against mass joinder.

The logistical hurdles described above are not mere hypotheticals. After Plaintiffs filed the FAC in Corley--without the Court's authorization--these 700 different names had to be inputted into the Court's Electronic Case Filing (" ECF" ) system. This input took place over two days, March 16 and 17, 2016. Over 700 names were again inputted into the ECF system after Plaintiffs filed their proposed protective order on May 13, 2016. These burdens will continue through discovery, pretrial proceedings and trial. Hard Drive Prods., 809 F.Supp.2d at 1164 (declining to allow joinder because joinder " would result in a logistically unmanageable case" and would not " promot[e] judicial economy and trial convenience" ).

In an attempt to counter these impracticability concerns, Public Citizen cites several cases where courts have " entertained suits with hundreds of plaintiffs joined together in one action under Rule 20." Public Citizen Opp'n at 3. None of these decisions, however, even address the propriety of joinder. Instead, all of these decisions focused on whether federal subject matter jurisdiction was proper.

Five cases involved motions to remand under the Class Action Fairness Act (" CAFA" ), and the remaining case involved a motion to remand under the Price Anderson Act (" PCA" ). Neither Plaintiffs nor Google, on the other hand, have filed a motion to remand or challenged whether federal subject matter jurisdiction is proper.

In two of the cases cited by Public Citizen, the court found that remand was appropriate. As such, the matter could not remain in federal court, and the court could not consider joinder issues. See Armstead v. Multi-Chem Gp., LLC., 2012 WL 1866862, *1 (W.D. La. May 21, 2012) (granting motion to remand); Aburto v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., 2009 WL 4884147, *1 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 16, 2009) (same).

In three of the remaining four decisions, the court did not even mention Rule 20(a), much less engage in any sort of discussion on joinder. See Bullard v. Burlington N. Santa Fe Ry. Co., 535 F.3d 759 (7th Cir. 2008) (finding CAFA jurisdiction); Acuna v. Brown & Root Co., 200 F.3d 335 (5th Cir. 2000) (finding jurisdiction under PCA); Adams v. Macon Cnty. Greyhound Park, Inc., 2011 WL 5513210 (M.D. Ala. Nov. 10, 2011) (finding CAFA jurisdiction). Lastly, in Gilmore v. Bayer Corp., 2009 WL 4789406, *3 (S.D. Ill.Dec. 9, 2009), a putative class action case involving 100 plaintiffs, the district court limited its Rule 20(a) discussion to whether plaintiffs had presented common questions of law and fact as to the side effects of a particular drug. The Gilmore court did not determine whether plaintiffs' claims arose from the same transaction or occurrence, or whether joinder was fundamentally fair. Moreover, the Gilmore court focused not on Rule 20(a)--its joinder discussion was a mere three sentences long--but on whether plaintiffs had sufficiently met CAFA's amount-in-controversy and minimum diversity requirements. Id.

Accordingly, none of the cases Public Citizen cites supports a finding of joinder in the present case. These cases address federal subject matter jurisdiction, an issue that has not been contested here. None of these cases involve an instance where class certification was previously denied, as it has been in the instant cases. In fact, all of the CAFA cases were putative class actions. After convening two hearings, examining two rounds of briefing, reviewing Public Citizen's amicus brief, and conducting its own research, the Court reaches the same conclusion as that of the Fifth Circuit in Acevedo : the Court has failed to identify " any cases in which a group of plaintiffs even remotely as numerous as 800 were able to join their claims." 600 F.3d at 522.

3. Avoidance of Fees

Finally, several courts have found misjoinder where a party's actions appear to be motivated by an attempt to avoid filing fees. In CineTel Films, Inc. v. Does 1-1052, 853 F.Supp.2d 545, 554 n.4 (D. Md. 2012), for instance, the district court noted that the judicial burden in mass joinder cases is " compounded by the fact that the increased work resulting from mass joinder requires no additional payment beyond the one-time . . . filing fee. Plaintiffs therefore in no way compensate financially for [their] significant drain on judicial resources." Placing such an " enormous burden" on the parties and the court does not promote " the administration of justice." Id. at 554.

Likewise, in IO Group, Inc. v. Does 1-435, 2011 WL 445043, *6 n.5 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2011), the district court noted that mass joinder, if left unchecked, would effectively " encourage [p]laintiffs . . . to join (or misjoin) as many doe defendants as possible," all while allowing plaintiffs to dodge " filing fees." Thus, " filing one mass action in order to identify hundreds of doe defendants through pre-service discovery and [to then] facilitate mass settlement," all through a single filing fee, does not promote the purposes underlying joinder. Id. at *6.

Here, Plaintiffs' counsel has admitted that he chose to join all 879 Plaintiffs because " requiring Plaintiffs to pay $282,800 in filing fees and to file and litigate more than 700+ virtually identical individual actions [would] amount[] to a disproportionate and unwarranted burden." Opp'n at 13. While Plaintiffs' counsel might have relieved himself of " a disproportionate and unwarranted burden," he has imposed " a disproportionate and unwarranted burden" on everyone else. As discussed above, Google faces an increased burden in terms of discovery, analysis of the consent exemption, and preparation for trial. The Court must also address how to move these cases forward in a fair, judicious, and efficient manner--a unique challenge given the 879 Plaintiffs with individual claims.

Moreover, if Plaintiffs in fact lacked the financial resources to file a new set of complaints, Plaintiffs could avail themselves of the same opportunity offered to other litigants: an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Under the federal in forma pauperis statute, a court may authorize the commencement of a suit without prepayment of the filing fee required by the clerk of the court if the plaintiff submits an affidavit of poverty showing that he or she is " unable to pay such fees or give security therefor." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); see also Civil L.R. 3-10 (providing in forma pauperis procedures for Northern District of California). The Court raised this point at the initial case management conference on April 20, 2016. In the four months since, Plaintiffs' counsel has yet to address why the in forma pauperis procedure would not alleviate their financial burden. Accordingly, consistent with the reasoning in CineTel and IO Group, the Court finds that Plaintiffs' counsel's attempt to avoid paying filing fees also weighs in Google's favor.

To conclude, if the Corley and Amaral cases were to proceed as is, there is a significant risk of jury confusion and prejudice to Google. Mass. joinder would also be impractical, and would allow Plaintiffs to impose an unjustified burden on judicial resources. Given these conditions, mass joinder does not comport with fundamental fairness, and the Court finds that either dismissal or severance is appropriate.

C. Case Management

Having determined that joinder is improper, the next issue is how to move this litigation forward. This issue implicates two separate but related questions. First, should Plaintiffs be severed, or dismissed without prejudice? Second, should Plaintiffs be required to proceed individually, through individual, separate complaints, or allowed to proceed by educational institution or some other grouping? The Court addresses these questions in turn.

1. Severance vs. Dismissal

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 provides that " [m]isjoinder of parties is not a ground for dismissing an action. On motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed.R.Civ.P. 21. Alternatively, " [t]he court may . . . sever any claim against a party." Id. " The effect of each option is quite different. When a court 'drops' a [party] under Rule 21, that [party] is dismissed from the case without prejudice." DirecTV, Inc. v. Leto, 467 F.3d 842, 845 (3d Cir. 2006). " When that occurs, the statute of limitations is not tolled because we treat the initial complaint as if it never existed." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). " But when a court 'severs' a claim against a [party] under Rule 21, the suit simply continues against the severed [party] in another guise." Id. " The statute of limitations is held in abeyance, and the severed suit can proceed so long as it initially was filed within the limitations period." Id.

" Because a district court's decision to remedy misjoinder by dropping and dismissing a party, rather than severing the relevant claim [or party], may have important and potentially adverse statute-of-limitations consequences, the discretion delegated to the trial judge to dismiss under Rule 21 is restricted to what is 'just.'" Id. " [D]istrict courts who dismiss rather than sever must conduct a prejudice analysis, including loss of otherwise timely claims if new suits are blocked by statutes of limitations." Rush v. Sport Chalet, Inc., 779 F.3d 973, 975 (9th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted).

In the present cases, the severance or dismissal decision does implicate the statute of limitations. Google ceased scanning GAFE emails on April 30, 2014. The Wiretap Act has a two-year statute of limitations. Both the Corley case, filed on January 27, 2016, and the Amaral case, filed on April 29, 2016, fall within this statute of limitations, which would fall on April 30, 2016. However, if the Court were to dismiss all but the original three Plaintiffs in Corley, the statute of limitations would likely bar the other 876 Plaintiffs from bringing suit.

At least some district courts in the Ninth Circuit have concluded that " any prejudice resulting from the statute of limitations is the risk assumed by the parties who caused the misjoinder." Robinson v. Geithner, 2011 WL 66158, *9 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2011); accord Funatanilla v. Tristan, 2010 WL 1267133, *6 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2010) (" [A]ny prejudice resulting from the statute of limitations is a result of [p]laintiff combining seven unrelated claims in one complaint, instead of filing seven separate actions." ).

Here, there is some evidence that Plaintiffs' counsel assumed the risk that the Court would find misjoinder. At the April 20, 2016 initial case management conference, when Plaintiffs' counsel stated his intention to file another case with several hundred Plaintiffs, each with individual claims, the Court informed counsel that he could not do so because doing so would be " improper." Hr'g Tr. at 31. Plaintiffs' counsel then stated that he would " file it in Superior Court and presumably Google will remove it." Id. at 32.

After the April 20, 2016 initial case management conference, Plaintiffs and Google filed on April 25, 2016 and April 26, 2016, respectively, briefs addressing the propriety of mass joinder. Plaintiffs' counsel confirmed at the April 28, 2016 case management conference that he would file another case with more than a hundred Plaintiffs in state court. ECF No. 85 at 4. That case, filed on April 29, 2016 in Santa Clara County Superior Court, was Amaral.

Thus, prior to April 30, 2016, the Wiretap Act's statute of limitations deadline, Plaintiffs' counsel (1) learned the relevant law regarding joinder in order to prepare his April 25, 2016 brief, and (2) knew that the complaints in Corley and Amaral may have been improper. Nevertheless, Plaintiffs' counsel proceeded to file Amaral in state court on April 29, 2016, and decided not to separate Plaintiffs in Corley into separate complaints.

Two considerations, however, weigh against dismissal. First, the instant actions present several novel legal questions. No other court has addressed mass joinder in the Wiretap Act context. Public Citizen's amicus brief further highlights the fact that the instant motions raise novel legal issues. Second, although the Ninth Circuit has not squarely addressed the issue, other circuits have generally held that a district court should sever rather than dismiss parties when the statute of limitations comes into play. In Elmore v. Henderson, 227 F.3d 1009, 1012 (7th Cir. 2000), for instance, the Seventh Circuit stated that " [t]he district judge could and should have allowed [plaintiff's] claim against [defendant] to continue as a separate suit so that it would not be time-barred." The Elmore court cited case law from the Third Circuit to support its conclusion.

Consequently, given the fact that the instant case presents novel legal issues and that other courts generally caution against dismissal, the Court declines to dismiss 876 Plaintiffs. Instead, Plaintiffs shall be severed, pursuant to the approach outlined below.

2. Proceeding Through Individual Complaints

Plaintiffs, if they elect to continue with this litigation, should prosecute their claims by individual Plaintiff. This means that the three original Plaintiffs--Ryan Corley, William Dormann, and Shannon Mehaffey--would remain in one action, but that the other 876 Plaintiffs would be severed, and Plaintiffs' counsel would need to file 876 additional complaints.

Each complaint must include specific factual allegations, which at a minimum would include each Plaintiff's GAFE email address, when each Plaintiff signed up for GAFE, what each Plaintiff saw and read in deciding to sign up for GAFE, and whether each Plaintiff ever changed his GAFE settings to allow or prevent Google's interception and scanning. The Court reaches this conclusion based on the following six considerations.

First, as outlined above, Plaintiffs have failed to meet the same transaction or occurrence requirement. Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Visendi, there is a lack of factual similarity amongst the joined Plaintiffs. 733 F.3d at 870. Each Plaintiff's case rests upon an individualized consent analysis. Did a Plaintiff read a particular policy? Did those policies change over time? Did a Plaintiff change his or her privacy settings? Did a Plaintiff hear about Google's practices through a third-party media source? These questions must be examined on a Plaintiff by Plaintiff basis.

Second, the Court has considered severance by educational institution--an option advocated by Plaintiffs and Public Counsel--but finds that this option does not meaningfully address the same transaction or occurrence requirement or the fairness concerns discussed in this Order. Of the 879 Plaintiffs, 243 are affiliated with the University of California, Santa Cruz; 90 with the University of Arizona; 83 with the University of Michigan; 77 with New York University; 69 with the University of California, Berkeley; and 56 with New York University. ECF No. 129 at 3. An action involving 243, 90, 83, 77, 69, or 56 individual claims would be unmanageable given the individualized inquiries necessary in the instant cases.

Third, and relatedly, severance by school would likely result in even more motions to sever. Google has in fact stated that " school-based actions would still present the individualized questions of whether each Plaintiff . . . consented to Google's automated processing." Reply at 14. The Corley case was originally filed on January 27, 2016. In the seven months since, the Court has, for purposes of addressing the issue of joinder, held three case management conferences focused on joinder, reviewed multiple rounds of briefing, and received an amicus brief. If the Court were to sever by educational institution, and if Google were to file another set of motions to sever, it would take months before the Court could turn to the fundamental merits of Plaintiffs' claim. That would disserve the parties, the Court, and the general public.

Fourth, the Court has provided Plaintiffs' counsel ample opportunity to address potential issues involving misjoinder. Plaintiffs' counsel was, as an initial matter, never even authorized to file the Corley FAC, which added over 700 Plaintiffs. Next, at the April 20, 2016 case management conference, the Court stated that Plaintiffs' counsel's filing of another case with several hundred Plaintiffs, each with individual claims, would be improper given the numerous unresolved issues concerning joinder in Corley. After the April 20 and 28, 2016 case management conferences, Plaintiffs' counsel filed Amaral, a case in state court with 175 Plaintiffs on April 29, 2016, even though Plaintiffs' counsel knew the case would be removed to federal court and related to the Corley case before the undersigned judge.

Fifth, such a decision is consistent with the reasoning in Gmail. In Gmail, the Court examined the differences between the disclosures provided at each university. The Court, for instance, compared the privacy policies of the University of Hawaii with those of the University of California, Santa Cruz. 2014 WL 1102660, *6. However, as the Court also pointed out, both GAFE and non-GAFE users may have also " learned of Google's interceptions" from a " panoply of [other] sources." Id. at *17. Google's practices were, for instance, subject to media scrutiny. Id. at n.12. Thus, " [a] fact-finder, in determining whether [an individual] consented, would have to evaluate to which of the various sources each individual user had been exposed and whether each individual knew about and consented to the interception based on the sources to which she was exposed." Id. at *18 (internal quotation marks omitted).

Sixth, and finally, Plaintiffs' counsel has had ample time to prepare and look into the specific factual allegations that pertain to each Plaintiff. Over the past five months, Plaintiffs' counsel has been well aware that the Court may sever Plaintiffs, and that the FAC lacked sufficient factual specificity as to each Plaintiff.

Nonetheless, the Court recognizes the unique nature of this case and is cognizant of the inherent difficulties in filing 876 individual complaints. Accordingly, although the Court's general practice is to provide parties 30 days to file an amended pleading, the Court will grant Plaintiffs' request for extra time, which Plaintiffs' counsel made at the August 18, 2016 case management conference. Thus, if Plaintiffs elect to proceed in this litigation, Plaintiffs must file 876 complaints within 45 days of this Order.

IV. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Google's motions to sever are GRANTED. All but the original three Plaintiffs--Ryan Corley, William Dormann, and Shannon Mehaffey--are SEVERED. Should the other 876 Plaintiffs elect to proceed with their claims, Plaintiffs' counsel shall file 876 individual complaints. Plaintiff shall do so within 45 of this Order. Failure to meet this 45-day deadline will result in a dismissal of the 876 Plaintiffs' claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs may not add new causes of actions or parties without leave of the Court or stipulation of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Corley v. Google, Inc.

Summary

Opinion

Corley v. Google, Inc.

Corley v. Google, Inc.

Case Details

Citations

Citing Cases

Corley v. Google, Inc.

Summary

Opinion

Corley v. Google, Inc.

Corley v. Google, Inc.

Case Details

CitationsCopy Citation

Citing Cases

Citations