From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conyers v. Michigan Department of Corrections

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 14, 2006
File no: 5:06-CV-100 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 14, 2006)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

dismissing claim of inadequate exercise where "[p]laintiff does not allege that he is denied sufficient opportunity for exercise in order to maintain reasonably good health."

Summary of this case from Ellis v. Mohr
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

File no: 5:06-CV-100.

September 14, 2006

ORDER APPROVING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ROBERT BELL, Chief District Judge

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. Nothing has been filed by either party that would constitute objections.

ACCORDINGLY, the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted as the opinion of the Court.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: Plaintiff's motion for disqualification (docket #4) is hereby DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915A(b), and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c). This dismissal shall count as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The Court further finds that there is no good-faith basis for appeal within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

Summaries of

Conyers v. Michigan Department of Corrections

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 14, 2006
File no: 5:06-CV-100 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 14, 2006)

dismissing claim of inadequate exercise where "[p]laintiff does not allege that he is denied sufficient opportunity for exercise in order to maintain reasonably good health."

Summary of this case from Ellis v. Mohr

dismissing claim of inadequate exercise where "Plaintiff does not allege that he is denied sufficient opportunity for exercise in order to maintain reasonably good health."

Summary of this case from Bellomy-Gunn v. Lester

dismissing claim of inadequate exercise where "Plaintiff does not allege that he is denied sufficient opportunity for exercise in order to maintain reasonably good health."

Summary of this case from Rogers v. Shelby County
Case details for

Conyers v. Michigan Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EARNEST CONYERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 14, 2006

Citations

File no: 5:06-CV-100 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 14, 2006)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. Shelby County

He was not isolated or deprived of human contact. As for Plaintiff's claim that he is not afforded an…

Ozier v. Berghuis

levels of ETS contrary to contemporary standards of decency); Hankins v. Bethea, No. CIVA 0:05-3334 DCNBM,…

9 Citing Cases