From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Continental Can Co. v. Gavalik

U.S.
Dec 7, 1987
484 U.S. 979 (1987)

Summary

noting similarity between § 510 ERISA claims and employment discrimination claims under Title VII

Summary of this case from Ehrlich v. Howe

Opinion

No. 86-1659.

December 7, 1987.


C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE would grant certiorari. Reported below: 812 F. 2d 834.


Summaries of

Continental Can Co. v. Gavalik

U.S.
Dec 7, 1987
484 U.S. 979 (1987)

noting similarity between § 510 ERISA claims and employment discrimination claims under Title VII

Summary of this case from Ehrlich v. Howe

noting that Congress did not intend that plaintiff raising discrimination claim under ERISA be required to exhaust arbitral remedies

Summary of this case from Borenstein v. Tucker
Case details for

Continental Can Co. v. Gavalik

Case Details

Full title:CONTINENTAL CAN CO. v. GAVALIK ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 7, 1987

Citations

484 U.S. 979 (1987)
108 S. Ct. 495

Citing Cases

State v. Harris

However, the issues presently before us, 1) a passenger's standing to challenge the lawfulness of the…

Millsap v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

220. A plaintiff alleging a violation of section 510 must prove that the employer discharged or discriminated…