explaining that a court "must conduct a Grazier hearing and elicit information in accordance with Pa.R.Crim.P. 121 before petitioner will be permitted to proceed pro se," even if an intention to do so "is evinced"
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Pilchesky1469 MDA 2018
03-31-2020
COM. v. AINA, A.
Vacated/Remanded.
explaining that a court "must conduct a Grazier hearing and elicit information in accordance with Pa.R.Crim.P. 121 before petitioner will be permitted to proceed pro se," even if an intention to do so "is evinced"
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. PilcheskyFull title:COM. v. AINA, A.
Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Date published: Mar 31, 2020
The trial court nevertheless permitted Appellant to challenge the sufficiency of the Commonwealth's evidence…