Summary
In Coloso, we held that the trial court should first have entered an order requiring the third party to show cause and allowed them an opportunity to file written defenses, and that they should have been examined in the county of their residence.
Summary of this case from Sverdahl v. Farmers & Merchants Savings BankOpinion
No. 4-86-0378.
July 23, 1986. Rehearing Denied September 11, 1986.
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Linda L. Vitale, J.
Daniel P. Tunick, Miami, for appellants.
Blaise Picchi, of Blaise Picchi, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
This is an appeal from an order entered in supplementary proceedings following final judgment. Prior to ordering the impleading of the parties, who now appeal, the trial court should have issued an order to show cause which set forth the allegations against the appellants, thus giving them an opportunity to respond. Failure to do so prevented them from having their day in court. Robert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh, 363 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
Moreover, the trial court's order requiring the third parties to be examined in Broward County was error. Under section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes (1985), the trial court should arrange for a special master to examine them in the county where they reside. Their affidavit in this case establishes residence in Dade County. As a result, the trial court erred in requiring that the examination be conducted in Broward.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
DOWNEY, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.