From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colonnade Mgt. v. Warner

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department
Feb 21, 2006
11 Misc. 3d 52 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

Summary

In Colonnade Management, LLC v. Warner, 11 Misc.3d 52, 812 N.Y.S.2d 209 (App. Term, 1st Dept. 2006), the Appellate Term, First Department held that in spite of the enactment of RSL § 26-511 (c)(14) parties to a rent stabilized lease are free to agree to a preferential rent which may endure past the expiration of the lease into any renewal period(s).

Summary of this case from Maury v. 26 Fort Charles Place

Opinion

570516/04.

February 21, 2006.

APPEAL from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Timmie Erin Elsner, J.), dated June 23, 2004. The order denied petitioner's motion for summary judgment in a summary holdover proceeding.

Wasserman Grubin Rogers, LLP, New York City ( Richard Wasserman of counsel), for appellant.

John D. Gorman, New York City, for respondent.

Before: SUAREZ, P.J., DAVIS and GANGEL-JACOB, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Order, dated June 23, 2004, affirmed, with $10 costs.

The 2003 amendment (L 2003, ch 82, § 6) to the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (Administrative Code of City of NY) § 26-501 et seq. (RSL) permits an owner to discontinue a preferential rent and to resume charging the legal regulated rent upon a renewal lease. RSL § 26-511 (c) (14) pertinently provides that where a tenant is charged and pays a preferential rent, "the amount of rent . . . which may be charged upon renewal or upon vacancy . . . may, at the option of the owner, be based upon [either such preferential rent or an amount not more than the] previously established legal regulated rent. . . ."

Despite its seemingly broad sweep, "the 2003 amendment was not intended to preclude the parties to a lease or stipulation from agreeing to a rent preference that would endure beyond the terms of the lease into renewal periods" ( Aijaz v. Hillside Place, LLC, 8 Misc 3d 73, 76). Thus, where an owner and tenant expressly agree that a preferential rent will last for the life of the tenancy, the tenant is entitled to have such a lease provision carried over into subsequent renewal leases ( id.).

The preferential lease rider under review here unequivocally and explicitly provides for a rent concession for the duration of the tenancy. Since the parties' intent is clearly and unambiguously manifested in the written agreement, the agreement controls, and tenant is entitled to the benefit of the preferential rent provision throughout his tenancy ( see Matter of Century Operating Corp. v. Popolizio, 60 NY2d 483; Matter of Missionary Sisters of Sacred Heart, Ill. v. New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 283 AD2d 284).


Summaries of

Colonnade Mgt. v. Warner

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department
Feb 21, 2006
11 Misc. 3d 52 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

In Colonnade Management, LLC v. Warner, 11 Misc.3d 52, 812 N.Y.S.2d 209 (App. Term, 1st Dept. 2006), the Appellate Term, First Department held that in spite of the enactment of RSL § 26-511 (c)(14) parties to a rent stabilized lease are free to agree to a preferential rent which may endure past the expiration of the lease into any renewal period(s).

Summary of this case from Maury v. 26 Fort Charles Place
Case details for

Colonnade Mgt. v. Warner

Case Details

Full title:COLONNADE MANAGEMENT, LLC, Appellant, v. STURGIS WARNER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department

Date published: Feb 21, 2006

Citations

11 Misc. 3d 52 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 26055
812 N.Y.S.2d 209

Citing Cases

United W. LLC v. Margulies

The 2003 Amendment does permit owners to discontinue a preferential rent and to assume charging the legal…

Wellington Fee, LLC v. Cotter

While an agreement between a landlord and tenant that a preferential rent will continue throughout the…