From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cochran v. Howell

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District
Mar 6, 1964
46 Ill. App. 2d 304 (Ill. App. Ct. 1964)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Cochran, two plaintiffs sued a defendant for conversion. A judgment order was entered for one plaintiff, but it did not mention or dispose of the claim of the other.

Summary of this case from In re Johnson
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Gen. No. 10,495. (Abstract of Decision.)

March 6, 1964.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean County; the Hon. R. BURNELL PHILLIPS, Judge, presiding. Reversed and remanded.

Kenneth L. Strong, of Pontiac, for appellant;

W. Loren Thomson, of Bloomington, for appellees.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE CROW.

Not to be published in full.

Summaries of

Cochran v. Howell

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District
Mar 6, 1964
46 Ill. App. 2d 304 (Ill. App. Ct. 1964)

In Cochran, two plaintiffs sued a defendant for conversion. A judgment order was entered for one plaintiff, but it did not mention or dispose of the claim of the other.

Summary of this case from In re Johnson
Case details for

Cochran v. Howell

Case Details

Full title:Charles E. Cochran, and Russell S. Proctor, Inc., a Delaware Corporation…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 6, 1964

Citations

46 Ill. App. 2d 304 (Ill. App. Ct. 1964)
197 N.E.2d 87

Citing Cases

Textile Banking Com., Inc. v. Rentschler

Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 110, § 73 (1979). See also Cochran v. Howell, 46 Ill.App.2d 304, 197 N.E.2d 87 (1964);…

In re Johnson

Since the judgment order of November 7, 1980 disposed of the entire controversy, Rule 304(a) is not…

4 Citing Cases