questioning whether, in absence of seizure of unique property or privileged documents, party can demonstrate irreparable harm when government provides copies of seized documents or returned originals
Summary of this case from Flores v. GoldsmithNo. 81-1554.
April 19, 1982.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 650 F. 2d 1033.
questioning whether, in absence of seizure of unique property or privileged documents, party can demonstrate irreparable harm when government provides copies of seized documents or returned originals
Summary of this case from Flores v. Goldsmithquestioning whether, in absence of seizure of unique property or privileged documents, party can demonstrate irreparable harm when government provides copies of seized documents or returns originals
Summary of this case from IN RE SEARCH WARRANT ISSUED JULY 14describing district court's standard but not passing on it
Summary of this case from Roberts v. U.S.Full title:CLARK ET AL. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 19, 1982
Although the Commission also based its finding upon certain nonbroadcast misconduct engaged in by RKO's…
U.S. v. Pro-Ag, Inc.Indeed, nothing prohibits food from also being a biologic, and all biologics are by definition drugs. Grand…