Summary
In City of Toledo v. Gas Co., 6 Cir., 90 F.2d 1003, Mississippi Power Co. v. City of Aberdeen, D.C., 11 F. Supp. 951, and Mississippi Power Light Co. v. City of Jackson, D.C., 9 F. Supp. 564, ordinances were involved, and the question was whether the Johnson Act applied. No one connected with those cases appears to have thought the ordinances outside the Act for the highly technical reasons advanced by plaintiff.
Summary of this case from East Ohio Gas Co. v. City of ClevelandOpinion
No. 7639.
June 2, 1937.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; Hahn, Judge.
Martin S. Dodd and J. Nathanson, both of Toledo, Ohio, for appellant.
John B. McMahon, Franklin F. Hayward, and Tyler, Wilson Rhinefort, all of Toledo, Ohio, and Freeman T. Eagleson, of Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.
Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.
In this cause the order granting an interlocutory injunction is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set out in the order of the District Court entered January 14, 1937.