relying on quoted legislative history in holding that certain retirement benefits were conditional and in the nature of early retirement benefits and so could not be considered accrued benefits
Summary of this case from Ashenbaugh v. Crucible 1975 Salaried Ret. PNo. 83-1589.
May 21, 1984.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 722 F. 2d 1284.
relying on quoted legislative history in holding that certain retirement benefits were conditional and in the nature of early retirement benefits and so could not be considered accrued benefits
Summary of this case from Ashenbaugh v. Crucible 1975 Salaried Ret. Pdistinguishing accrued normal retirement benefits from early retirement benefits
Summary of this case from Blessitt v. Retirement Plan for Employees of Dixie Engine Co.Full title:CITY OF NORTH OLMSTEAD, Ohio v. GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT…
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 21, 1984
An employer may change such benefits without violating ERISA. See Sutton v. Weirton Steel Division of…
Cunha v. Ward Foods, Inc.However, for the same reasons as discussed supra, we would find no merit in the Employees breach of fiduciary…