From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Camden v. Forrest

Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2020
140 S. Ct. 902 (2020)

Summary

explaining that “despites their label, the Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions are not drafted by members of this Court, and are thus ‘neither law nor precedential.'”

Summary of this case from United States v. Zareck

Opinion

No. 19-593

01-13-2020

CITY OF CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY, Petitioner, v. Alanda FORREST.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


Summaries of

City of Camden v. Forrest

Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2020
140 S. Ct. 902 (2020)

explaining that “despites their label, the Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions are not drafted by members of this Court, and are thus ‘neither law nor precedential.'”

Summary of this case from United States v. Zareck
Case details for

City of Camden v. Forrest

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY, Petitioner, v. Alanda FORREST.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: Jan 13, 2020

Citations

140 S. Ct. 902 (2020)
205 L. Ed. 2d 465

Citing Cases

Williams v. City of Philadelphia

A plaintiff may also state a basis for municipal liability by “alleging failure-to-supervise, train, or…

Welch v. Cnty. of Burlington

” Forrest v. Parry, 930 F.3d 93, 105-06 (3d Cir. 2019), cert. denied sub nom. City of Camden, New Jersey v.…