From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City Mgmt Group v. Amer Reliance Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 2, 1988
528 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Summary

finding a presumption of prejudice to the insurer arose as a result of late notice, and there was nothing in the record to overcome this presumed prejudice or to raise genuine factual issues in relation to it

Summary of this case from 1500 Coral Towers Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.

Opinion

No. 88-87.

August 2, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Steven D. Robinson, J.

Robert J. Schaffer and Mark V. Silverio, for appellant.

Wallace, Engels, Pertnoy, Martin Solowsky and David L. Deehl, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


The final summary judgment under review is affirmed upon a holding that (a) the insured, City Management Group Corporation, was, without dispute, over two years late in notifying its insurer, American Reliance Insurance Co., of the subject accident in this case, and, consequently, was in breach of the notice provisions of the insurance policy herein; (b) a presumption of prejudice to the insurer arose as a result of this late notice, and there is nothing in the record to overcome this presumed prejudice or to raise genuine factual issues in relation thereto, see Tiedtke v. Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York, 222 So.2d 206, 209 (Fla. 1969); (c) this breach of the notice provisions of the insurance policy herein, which is presumed prejudicial to the insurer, relieved the insurer of any obligations under the said policy to pay the judgment herein or to defend the subject lawsuit, including an appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside the instant default judgment, see Ideal Mut. Ins. Co. v. Waldrep, 400 So.2d 782, 785-86 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Deese v. Hartford Accident Indem. Co., 205 So.2d 328, 331 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967); Hartford Accident Indem. Co. v. Mills, 171 So.2d 190, 195 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 179 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1965); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ranson, 121 So.2d 175, 182 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); and (d) this being so, a summary judgment for the insurer herein was entirely proper. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

City Mgmt Group v. Amer Reliance Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 2, 1988
528 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

finding a presumption of prejudice to the insurer arose as a result of late notice, and there was nothing in the record to overcome this presumed prejudice or to raise genuine factual issues in relation to it

Summary of this case from 1500 Coral Towers Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.

finding a presumption of prejudice to the insurer arose as a result of late notice, and there was nothing in the record to overcome this presumed prejudice or to raise genuine factual issues in relation to it

Summary of this case from 1500 Coral Towers Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.
Case details for

City Mgmt Group v. Amer Reliance Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CITY MANAGEMENT GROUP CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 2, 1988

Citations

528 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Occidental Intern., Inc.

The modern trend is to treat insurance contracts as adhesions contracts and to uphold the insurer's…

Wheeler's Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Markel Ins. Co.

As previously indicated, the facts of this case demonstrate, as a matter of law, a presumption of prejudice.…