From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chicas v. Doe

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 1, 2015
166 So. 3d 238 (La. 2015)

Summary

noting that "in light of [Bulletin 08-02], the absence of a blank box for the policy number does not create a question of fact concerning the form's validity"

Summary of this case from Guidry v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.

Opinion

No. 2015–CC–0147.

05-01-2015

Jose CHICAS v. John DOE, et al.


Opinion

Granted. The regulations of the Commissioner of Insurance, as contained in LDOI Bulletin 08–02, provide for a box on the UM selection form which the insurer may use for policy information purposes, such as policy number, binder number, application number, etc. The regulations further provide, “[t]his box does not need to be filled in for the form to be properly completed.” In light of this provision, the absence of a blank box for the policy number does not create a question of fact concerning the form's validity. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and summary judgment is granted in favor of relator.


Summaries of

Chicas v. Doe

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 1, 2015
166 So. 3d 238 (La. 2015)

noting that "in light of [Bulletin 08-02], the absence of a blank box for the policy number does not create a question of fact concerning the form's validity"

Summary of this case from Guidry v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.
Case details for

Chicas v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:Jose CHICAS v. John DOE, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: May 1, 2015

Citations

166 So. 3d 238 (La. 2015)

Citing Cases

Sacks v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

Thus, under the commissioner's current regulations, the policy number is optional; the number need not be…

Osborne v. Benson

LDOI Bulletin 08-02 was provided by the Commissioner of Insurance under LA R.S. 22:1295(1)(a)(ii) and in…