Summary
finding that an employer's denial of training opportunities and developmental work assignments did not amount to an adverse action
Summary of this case from Knight v. McCarthyOpinion
No. 12-1803
01-25-2013
TAMORAH L. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury, Defendant - Appellee.
Tamorah L. Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Ann Edelstein, Bernard G. Kim, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01016-GBL-TRJ) Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tamorah L. Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Ann Edelstein, Bernard G. Kim, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tamorah L. Chapman, a former employee of the Internal Revenue Service, appeals the district court's order granting the Secretary of the Treasury's motions for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment, and dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave for Chapman to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion. See Chapman v. Geithner, No. 1:11-cv-01016-GBL-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 30, 2012 & entered May 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED