From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 30, 2001
532 U.S. 1011 (2001)

Summary

determining it was proper to consider a subsequent crime as a prior violent felony since the statute referred to previous convictions and not previous crimes

Summary of this case from Paris v. Carlton

Opinion

APRIL 30, 2001


No. 00-8709. SWEED v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8709. SWEED v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8711. TONEY v. STUBBLEFIELD, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSOURI EASTERN CORRECTIONAL CENTER. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8717. GUY v. ANDERSON, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8718. SMITH v. OKLAHOMA. Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8720. BLANK v. COX ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1357.

No. 00-8724. MCINTOSH v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8730. QUINN v. ROBINSON, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8732. BAUMER v. LASATER ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8733. CHAKY v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8737. ZIMMERMAN v. HANKS, SUPERINTENDENT, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8741. SKOLNICK ET AL. v. ILLIINOIS ET AL. App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8743. FADAEL, AKA BARTH v. CAPE SAVINGS BANK ET AL. Sup.Ct. N.J. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8756. KNIGHT v. FLORIDA. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 770 So.2d 663.

No. 00-8763. JUARBE v. HENDRICKS, ADMINISTRATOR, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8766. PATTERSON v. MURPHY ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 30, 2001
532 U.S. 1011 (2001)

determining it was proper to consider a subsequent crime as a prior violent felony since the statute referred to previous convictions and not previous crimes

Summary of this case from Paris v. Carlton

determining it was proper to consider a subsequent crime as a prior violent felony since the statute referred to previous convictions and not previous crimes

Summary of this case from Sutton v. Bell

determining it was proper to consider a subsequent crime as a prior violent felony since the statute referred to previous convictions and not previous crimes

Summary of this case from Nichols v. Bell
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 30, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 1011 (2001)

Citing Cases

Sutton v. Bell

Sutton's sentencing jury was permitted to conduct a backward-looking and forward-looking inquiry when looking…

Rehearing Denied

No. 00-8625. BROOKS-BEY v. KUPEC, WARDEN, ET AL., 532 U.S. 952; No. 00-8741. SKOLNICK ET AL. v. ILLINOIS ET…