From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 15, 2002
535 U.S. 1000 (2002)

Summary

holding that petitioner did not establish ineffective assistance based on defense counsel's failure to call an expert witness because petitioner failed to show that counsel's decision was so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have chosen that strategy

Summary of this case from D'Amico v. Sec'y of Dep't of Corr.

Opinion

APRIL 15, 2002


No. 01-8368 SMITH v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 19 Fed. Appx. 135.

No. 01-8369 McCLOM v. GRAMLEY. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8373 TAYLOR v. WADDLE ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 31 Fed. Appx. 153.

No. 01-8374 VARGAS v. JORGENSEN. Sup.Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 627 N.W.2d 550.

No. 01-8378 JONES v. SOBINA, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT SOMERSET, ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8382 TOLBERT v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8383 DORSEY v. CHAPMAN, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 262 F.3d 1181.

No. 01-8385 COX v. LINDSEY, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8390 SCOTT v. LaMARQUE, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 27 Fed. Appx. 858.

No. 01-8391 JACKSON v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8394 SIMS v. WARD, WARDEN. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8395 MONTOYA v. SHEARIN, WARDEN. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 276 F.3d 578.

No. 01-8396 CRIM v. CONNECTICUT COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITES ET AL. Sup.Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8398 BASILIO v. CAMRAY DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ET AL. Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 15, 2002
535 U.S. 1000 (2002)

holding that petitioner did not establish ineffective assistance based on defense counsel's failure to call an expert witness because petitioner failed to show that counsel's decision was so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have chosen that strategy

Summary of this case from D'Amico v. Sec'y of Dep't of Corr.

holding that petitioner did not establish ineffective assistance based on defense counsel's failure to call an expert witness because petitioner failed to show that counsel's decision was so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have chosen that strategy

Summary of this case from Gannaway v. United States
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 15, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 1000 (2002)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Thomas

The confidential informant testified at the first trial that, when he purchased the cocaine, he was greeted…

U.S. v. Smith

Cross-Examinations:Dorsey v. Chapman262 F.3d 1181cert. denied 535 U.S. 1000 The pre-sentence report…