Summary
changing "the San Diego County District Attorney contends" to "the State contends"
Summary of this case from Seeboth v. MaybergOpinion
No. 03-56766.
Argued and Submitted May 3, 2005.
Filed October 17, 2005. Amended December 15, 2005.
Matthew D. Brown, CJA, San Francisco, CA (argued); Christopher R.J. Pace, Cooley Goodward LLP, San Diego, CA (briefed), for the petitioner-appellant.
Bradley A. Weinreb, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for the respondents-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-01-00721-IEG/JFS.
Before PREGERSON, FISHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
At slip op. 14213, change "the San Diego County District Attorney contends" to "the State contends."
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the Appellant's petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc, and the panel voted to deny the Appellee's petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35. The petitions filed by both parties for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc are DENIED.