From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION
Sep 19, 2013
4:12-cv-00075-RLY-TAB (S.D. Ind. Sep. 19, 2013)

Summary

reversing the ALJ's decision because he failed to explain his reasoning for concluding a treating physician's questionnaire should be rejected

Summary of this case from Coleman v. Colvin

Opinion

4:12-cv-00075-RLY-TAB

2013-09-19

LISA L. CARTER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Complaint for Judicial Review. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this court to file objection; none were filed. The court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation

________

RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana
Distributed Electronically to Registered Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Carter v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION
Sep 19, 2013
4:12-cv-00075-RLY-TAB (S.D. Ind. Sep. 19, 2013)

reversing the ALJ's decision because he failed to explain his reasoning for concluding a treating physician's questionnaire should be rejected

Summary of this case from Coleman v. Colvin
Case details for

Carter v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:LISA L. CARTER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION

Date published: Sep 19, 2013

Citations

4:12-cv-00075-RLY-TAB (S.D. Ind. Sep. 19, 2013)

Citing Cases

Jani B.S. v. Kijakazi

Without any such discussion or consideration, the Court is left without the opportunity for meaningful…

Jani B. S. v. Kijakazi

Without any such discussion or consideration, the Court is left without the opportunity for meaningful…